Interpreting photon correlations from independent sources

  • #106
Morbert said:
@DrChinese As the holidays are now over for me I will have to reduce my posting frequency but over the next couple days I will read your post and formulate a reply. I suspect this statement by Ma will be relevant but I will know for sure in my response.
No problem on timing, take all the time you need :smile:

But please don’t over focus on the Ma quote. Don’t forget that the Megadish paper demonstrates the same results. But it’s mechanism for stopping a swap is such that the issues you have been raising are not a factor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
javisot20 said:
I ask to understand better, if "swap yes" or "swap no" affects the results, doesn't that mean that the swap is also a form of measurement that breaks the entanglement between (1&4)?
The swap doesn’t break the entanglement, it creates the entanglement between 1 & 4. The swamp breaks the entanglement between 1 & 2 though (and between 3 & 4)
 
  • Like
Likes javisot20
  • #108
DrChinese said:
The swamp breaks the entanglement between 1 & 2 though (and between 3 & 4)
It breaks them to entangled 1&4 and 2&3 (not mutually), right?
 
Back
Top