Interval between double sonic booms

  • I
  • Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Interval
  • Featured
In summary, the conversation discusses the occurrence of sonic booms and their characteristics. The speaker recalls hearing a double boom and linking it to a Typhoon fighter jet accompanying a civilian aircraft. The interval between the booms is suggested to be related to the length of the aircraft and can be affected by the shape and position of the aircraft. It is also mentioned that the shock waves can diverge and the spacing between them may not be a precise measure of the aircraft's length. The conversation also considers the possibility of using the spacing of the booms to gauge the Mach number of the aircraft. Overall, the topic of sonic booms is explored and various factors that can affect them are discussed.
  • #36
hutchphd said:
What I still don't understand at all is how far from the aircraft does the true shockwave persist. Centimeters ? hundreds of meters?
I have the same problem. The only thing one can work on is those images which show a curved wavefront extending to a bit less than the size of the plane. Beyond that, the wavefront is 'straight' and that suggests that there is no change beyond the curved bit. The only alternative is to assume that the transition from shock wave to sound wave is way beyond what any of the photographs show. We can't be the only ones with this question so I have to conclude that the transition region is quite small.

I have some experience of ships' wakes and I can say that when I have been 'hit' by the wake of large ships, passing within several ship lengths (in deep water) I have not been aware of being pushed to one side; it's been largely up and down (scary at times) motion. So that implies to me that the 'shock wave' region is limited.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
hutchphd said:
I'm assuming the "double boom" is a "plus" step followed by a "minus" step. Yes?

As has already been stated, but I feel like elaborating, it's actually usually a positive step, followed by a linear negative slope, then another positive step. This is called an "N-wave", for obvious reasons. The magnitude of the overpressure is very small, since it is basically just a sound wave at the point it reaches the ground.

Interestingly, the reason for this shape is because a positive step following another positive step will tend to catch up to the front one, while a negative pressure change will tend to spread out. As a result, all the smaller positive steps coming off of various parts of the aircraft will tend to coalesce, while the negative pressure gradients will tend to spread out and smooth out until you get that characteristic N shape. You can see this very well here.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #38
hutchphd said:
The term " shock wave" is used very carelessly in the literature. What I still don't understand at all is how far from the aircraft does the true shockwave persist. Centimeters ? hundreds of meters? You can see the "N' pressure profile in some of the color enhanced schlieren imagery;
The actual shock only really persists as far from the plane as the flow itself is impacted. An oblique shock (by definition) causes the flow to change direction, so as soon as you're far enough away that the flow direction is basically unchanged through the wave, you're at the region where you have a sonic boom rather than a shock.

EDIT: Interestingly, this means that the shock will both be significantly stronger and persist farther from the plane when it is making more lift, such as when it is pulling a high-G turn, even if the airplane's shape and mach number are identical, simply because it has to affect more air in a larger volume around the plane.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #39
cjl said:
The actual shock only really persists as far from the plane as the flow itself is impacted.
Great; there's the answer.
cjl said:
while the negative pressure gradients will tend to spread out
A brilliant observation. It's something I have seen (a classic demo) of the wind in front of a loudspeaker at high sound levels. The wind is in the positive direction - momentum transfer directly to the air molecules - but the return flow is due to the pressure from all around. A candle flame is constantly pushed away.
There must be similar circular motion in the shock wave - I guess that's the quoted turbulence idea.
cjl said:
the shock will both be significantly stronger and persist farther from the plane when it is making more lift,
Another good observation!
 
  • #40
sophiecentaur said:
Are you saying that the waves you hear are due to individual local 'explosions'? I understood that the booms are caused by a pair of conical waves going past your ears.
It's not "explosions"; many concentric circles are just a simple way to describe it, and may help here. But think about the geometry of this. When the cone reaches you, the plane is past you. So where was the plane when the sound incorporated into that part of the cone was released?

It must be the shortest distance the sound can travel, which is the perpendicular/closest point of approach.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #41
russ_watters said:
It's not "explosions"; many concentric circles are just a simple way to describe it, and may help here. But think about the geometry of this. When the cone reaches you, the plane is past you. So where was the plane when the sound incorporated into that part of the cone was released?

It must be the shortest distance the sound can travel, which is the perpendicular/closest point of approach.
Yes - I get it now. It's isolated pulses involved and the nearest point is the source of the main part of the energy. The conical wavefront is formed by many contributing spherical wavelets though. It's a diffraction mechanism. The period of the pulse received is very long and it is only the lowest frequency parts of the spectrum that make it to the ground. Almost more of a 'woomph" than a "bang".
 
  • #42
russ_watters said:
It must be the shortest distance the sound can travel, which is the perpendicular/closest point of approach.
This is fundamentally true but oversimplified. Waves from parts of the path before and after the distance of closest approach also contribute to the front (they can do that only because the plane is supersonic). The ones that do it coherently are Gaussian distributed along the path with a sigma proportional to the wavelength centered at the point of closest approach. I have worked this out ( in Eikonal approximation) and will write it up when I can find a few hours. Obviously the long wavelengths then sample more of the path and so are more prominent in the "boom" front. The amplitude of the boom falls off like √ (distance of closest approach) because the wave is essentially a cylindrical wave.
This has been a great question!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
78
Views
10K
Back
Top