Introductory quantum mechanics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quantum mechanics problem involving the momentum operator and an arbitrary function A(x). Participants clarify that the expression for the commutator [px, A(x)] should not have ħ in the denominator, as this contradicts dimensional analysis. The correct formulation reveals that [px, A(x)] simplifies to -iħ*(dA(x)/dx). One user successfully evaluates the commutator and confirms their result aligns with the expected outcome, prompting a suggestion to consult the professor about a potential typo in the assignment. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper operator handling and dimensional consistency in quantum mechanics.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider A(x) is an arbitrary function of x, and px is the momentum operator. Show that they satisfy the following condition:
[px,A(x)] = (-i/ħ)*d/dx(A(x))

where [px,A(x)] = pxA(x) - A(x)px

Homework Equations


ħ = h/2π
px = (-iħ)d/dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting with the expression given at the bottom of the question and subbing in the expression for the momentum operator and factoring out -iħ, I get:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(d/dx(A(x)) - A(x)d/dx)

and I'm stuck there for the time being... I don't really understand how to get ħ into the denominator or what to do with the term in brackets. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys-student said:

Homework Statement


Consider A(x) is an arbitrary function of x, and px is the momentum operator. Show that they satisfy the following condition:
[px,A(x)] = (-i/ħ)*d/dx(A(x))
There must be a misprint in the problem as given to you. The ħ should be in the numerator. You can verify this by dimensional analysis.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Starting with the expression given at the bottom of the question and subbing in the expression for the momentum operator and factoring out -iħ, I get:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(d/dx(A(x)) - A(x)d/dx)

When unraveling commutators like this, it is usually a good idea the think of the commutator as acting on some arbitrary function f(x).

Thus, try to simplify [px, A(x)]f(x).
 
h-bar should not be in the denominator. Do a simple unit analysis to see that's not the case.

As for evaluating the commutator, I think it might help if you put the commutator in front of function. Remember p and A are operators, they need to operate on something.

[p,A]\psi = (pA - Ap)\psi = pA\psi - Ap\psi

Now A and psi are just functions of position. But p is a derivative operator acting on everything to its right. Recall the product rule.

pA\psi = p(A)\psi + Ap(\psi)

I'll let you do the rest. Hopefully this makes sense.
 
Thanks to both of you for the help. I've done as you suggested and solved the commutator and found that it was equal to dA(x)/dx, now the answer I have is:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(dA(x)/dx)

Another source I've seen online seems to suggest that the first term should be ħ/i (which is equal to my answer -iħ) I will ask my professor whether there is a typo in the assignment tomorrow.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top