Intuitive understanding(energy&momentum in particular)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mryumyum
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To gain an intuitive understanding of energy, potential energy, momentum, and angular momentum, it's suggested to focus on problem-solving rather than just theoretical training. Engaging with mechanics problems that interest you can enhance comprehension, allowing for a deeper grasp of concepts from first principles. Resources like Wikipedia are recommended for their comprehensive articles, providing more context than traditional textbooks. It's emphasized that overcoming technical challenges in problem-solving can lead to a better overall understanding. Ultimately, building intuition comes with practice and the ability to think critically about the concepts involved.
mryumyum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
where can one learn a more intuitive understanding of energy/potential energy and momentum/angular momentum?
i tire of being trained how to solve problems instead of actually using my head
i watched all videos on khan academy and tried looking for intuitive explanations at young,sears&zemansky's college physics, they did more training then teaching
can you please refer me to a book/textbook/website?
thanks for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the intuitive understanding comes mainly after you've been trained / trained yourself to solve technical problems. One of the most frustrating things for me is when I can't solve a problem because of some weakness in my maths or because I've made some silly technical mistake. Once you no longer have to worry about the mechanics of what you're doing then you can sort of sit back and think more generally about what's going on. An old professor of mine used to say that it's like learning to drive a car. Once you can change gear and negotiate traffic without having to think too hard then you can start to appreciate the journey.

On the other hand, it's probably not a good idea to get frustrated with the work. Maybe you could look around for some mechanics problems that interest you and work at solving them in your own way - building up a solution from the very beginning and making sure that you understand all of the steps. You could start at the homework help section of this site as there's bound to be some problems in the area that you're interested in. If I were you I'd choose a style of problem that I hadn't seen before and see if I could work out what's going on from first principles. This sort of thinking is probably the best way to build up your understanding.
 
For me I've been using wikipedia for all my inquiries. The reason is that a textbook is going to give a single sentence definition for a concept, and some of the big ones might have a paragraph, but wikipedia offers and entire article on a concept, which gives more in depth information pertaining to whatever it is you are studying. Give it a try, I've found it to be much more useful than any textbook.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top