Invariance of a volume element in phase space, What does it mean?

AI Thread Summary
The invariance of the volume element in phase space is demonstrated through the relationship between infinitesimal volume elements, expressed as dη and dρ, which are connected by the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. In canonical transformations, the equation dη = |M|dρ indicates that the volume elements remain invariant under these transformations. The physical implications of this invariance relate to the conservation of phase space volume in Hamiltonian systems, which is crucial for understanding dynamics. Additionally, this concept ties into the Poincaré recurrence theorem, suggesting that systems will return to a state close to their initial conditions over time. The discussion highlights the fundamental nature of volume preservation in the context of classical mechanics.
Maumas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have been reading the third edition of Classical Mechanics by Goldstein, in particular, chapter 9 Poisson Brackets and Other canonical invariants. And it is shown that the magnitude of a volume element is invariant. I can understand what it means mathematically, but what physical implications does it have?

I have been reading similar questions and noticed that this invariance is related to Liouville’s Theorem. But I do not understand the underlying physics.

Maybe someone can shed light on this issue
Relevant Equations
.
The invariance of this volume element is shown by writing the infinitesimal volume elements $$d\eta$$ and $$d\rho$$

$$d\eta=dq_1.....dq_ndp_1......dp_n$$

$$d\rho=dQ_1.......dQ_ndP_1....dP_n$$

and we know that both of them are related to each other by the absolute value of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. So I do understand that if we have a canonical transformation $$d\eta=|M|d\rho$$ is $$d\eta=d\rho$$ but i do not know what it means physically.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maumas said:
but what physical implications does it have?
A phase flow of a Hamiltonian system consists of canonical transformations. Now see the Poincare recurrence theorem.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top