Is 300eV the Correct Mean Photon Energy for a Black Body at 1 Million K?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Photon
AI Thread Summary
The mean photon energy for a black body at 1 million K is calculated to be approximately 300 eV. This value is significantly higher than the mean photon energy of solar radiation, which is around 1.74 eV for a temperature of about 5,800 K. Consequently, the peak wavelength of the black body spectrum at 1 million K is much shorter than that of the Sun. The calculations align with expectations for black body radiation. The discussion concludes with the participant feeling satisfied with the information received.
Orion78
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I have calculate that the mean approximate photon energy of a black-body spectrum which is emitted by an object at a temperature of 1 million K is 300eV. Can somebody confirm me that? My second doubt is: the wavelength at which this spectrum reaches a peak corresponds to a "longer" or to a "shorter" wavelength than that of the black-body spectrum emitted by the sun?
Many thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What do your calculations show for the Sun?
 
I did not do any calculation about the sun but think that the spectrum of solar radiation is close to that of a black body with a temperature of circa 5,800 K and so the mean approximate photon energy is 1.74eV. If that so, are the wavelength at which this spectrum of the object at at a temperature of 1 million K that reaches a peak corresponds to a much shorter wavelength than that of the black-body spectrum emitted by the sun?
 
300eV-photons have a shorter wavelength than 1.74eV-photons.
The numbers are in a region where I would expect them, but I did not calculate them.
 
Yes, the peak is a much shorter wavelength than the Sun emits. Do you know much about EM radiation and black body radiation?
 
Thanks. yes, now I have all the info I needed.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top