Is a transformer following ohm's law?

AI Thread Summary
Transformers do not violate Ohm's law, as the law applies to resistive loads rather than the transformer itself. When voltage is increased in a transformer, current decreases proportionally, maintaining the relationship dictated by Ohm's law when applied to both primary and secondary circuits. For example, applying 100 volts to a 10:1 transformer results in 10 volts on the secondary side, with corresponding changes in current. Misunderstandings often arise from incorrectly applying Ohm's law to the transformer as a whole instead of to its individual circuits. Overall, Ohm's law remains valid when analyzing the behavior of electricity through resistive loads connected to the transformer.
srishankar18
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
According to ohm's law voltage is directly proportional to current that is if voltage get increased current also should get increased but in a transformer if voltage get increased current get decreased.

so, Is a transformer is obeying ohm's law or not
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are not applying ohms law to the transformer correctly when stated the way you have. If you apply 100 volts to a 10:1 transformer you will end up with 10 volts out. If you put a 10 ohm resistor on the secondary you will have one ampere passing through the resistor. In an ideal transformer the 100 volt source will be sourcing .1 amps. Increase the primary voltage by a factor of 2 and the secondary voltage will increase by the same. The amps in both windings will increase by a factor of 2 as well. Ohms law has not been violated.
 
To put it another way, Ohms law is for determining the behavior of electricity through a load (a resistor). A transformer by itself is not a load.

We see people make this mistake a lot (that's 3 times in 3 days) and I don't know why...
 
Yep. Remember that Ohm's law only applies for Ohmic devices (which obey Ohm's law and hence named thus).

(Seriously, I'm not trying to be smart or patronising here.)
 
You apply Ohms law separately to the primary circuit and to the secondary circuit of a transformer. You do not use Ohms law to learn how the primary induces current in the secondary.
 
Thanks

Thanks a lot to every body who had taken care for replying this thread.

I've got some information from your answers.

Thank you ...:smile:
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top