Is a Two-Sided Reflective Dish Considered a Hologram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sciboinkhobbes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hologram
AI Thread Summary
A two-sided reflective dish does not qualify as a hologram; it operates on the principle of creating a virtual image rather than utilizing holography. The misconception likely arises from marketing terms like "holomirrors" and the popular portrayal of holograms in media, leading to confusion among audiences. True holograms are created using interference patterns from multiple light sources, which differs significantly from the functioning of reflective dishes. Discussions also touch on the development of 3D holographic projection systems, which have been limited by viewing angle constraints. Overall, the distinction between optical illusions and actual holography is crucial for accurate educational presentations.
sciboinkhobbes
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

An interesting discussion has arisen within my physics department.

Would this (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0002W3J7M/?tag=pfamazon01-20) two-sided reflective dish technically fit the definition of a hologram?

We often present this demonstration to schoolchildren, talking about how light reflects off of mirrors and discussing the focal point of the dish, but parents (and some children) are apt to ask whether it's a hologram. We want to make sure we're not leading them astray.

Thanks for any clarification!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sciboinkhobbes said:
Hello everyone,

An interesting discussion has arisen within my physics department.

Would this (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0002W3J7M/?tag=pfamazon01-20) two-sided reflective dish technically fit the definition of a hologram?

We often present this demonstration to schoolchildren, talking about how light reflects off of mirrors and discussing the focal point of the dish, but parents (and some children) are apt to ask whether it's a hologram. We want to make sure we're not leading them astray.

Thanks for any clarification!

That has nothing to do with holography. It works on the principle of a 'virtual image':

http://www.hope.edu/csi/Activity_Kits/FloatingCoin_Background.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Awesome, thank you! That confirms my suspicions. I'll have to let the physics freshmen know they can't tell the 10-year-olds it's a hologram any longer.

So my question is, how did this misconception arise in the first place? These optical illusion demonstrations are even marketed as "holomirrors". Does it have something to do with our conceptions of floating 3D holograms from the movies? It appears that a true hologram is much different, simply a photograph made with interference patterns from multiple light sources.

Is the confusion maybe also attributed to the idea of light interfering to produce the "floating coin" image?

And finally, are 3D holographic projections possible/have they been created (like Princess Leia... "Help me, Obi-Wan!")?
 
Are you asking why a company would give a meaningless spiffy sci-fi name to their product? I suspect marketing.

3D holographic projection systems have been developed in fits and spurts for the past 20 years or so- I'm not familiar with current state-of-the-art, but the systems I have seen have a very restricted view angle- your head has to be held in fairly precise alignment with the display.
 
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...

Similar threads

Back
Top