Is Absolute Convergence Required for Evaluating Sums over Rational Numbers?

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
it is possible to evaluate sums over the set of Rational

so \sum_{q} f(q) with q= \frac{m}{n} and m and n are POSITIVE integers different from 0 ??

in any case for a suitable function is possible to evaluate

\sum_{q} f(qx) with f(0)=0 ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think so, as the rationals are countable.
 
However, in some cases the sum will depend on the ordering of the rational numbers given by the one-to-one correspondence with the positive integers.
 
um.. if i use the fundamental theorem of the arithmetic to express m and n as a product of primes could i write or consider at least series over prime or prime powers ? i mean

\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{p}f(p^{m})

in both case this sum is over prime and prime powers is this more or less correct ??

using suitable products of primes we can reproduce every positive rational can't we ?

so we can study 'invariant-under-dilation' formulae as follows

\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{p}f(xp^{m})
 
HallsofIvy is correct: all rearrangements of a series converge to the same value if and only if the series is absolutely convergent. So that can affect the sum.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top