Is Adrianus J. Dekker forgotten or irrelevant?

In summary, I am thinking of buying Solid State Physics by Kittel, but it turns out it's not beginner friendly and neither is Ashcroft & Mermin. One book that is supposedly beginner friendly is AJ Dekker (1956) but it has received little discussion on this physics forum and on reddit (as a whole). I wonder why that is? I also want to understand the basics of Solid State Physics and I want the information to be relevant and accurate. Is AJ Dekker what I should read? So, should I buy AJ Dekker and is there a different book on solid state physics which is not cryptic and can be easily understood by a beginner.I was previously thinking of buying Solid State Physics by Kittel
  • #1
Slimy0233
167
48
I was previously thinking of buying Solid State Physics by Kittel, but it turns out it's not beginner friendly and neither is Ashcroft & Mermin. One book that is supposedly beginner friendly is AJ Dekker (1956) but it has received little discussion on this physics forum and on reddit (as a whole). I wonder why that is?

Also, I want to understand the basics of Solid State Physics and I want the information to be relevant and accurate. Is AJ Dekker what I should read? So, should I buy AJ Dekker and is there a different book on solid state physics which is not cryptic and can be easily understood by a beginner.

PS: I really want to buy Dekker, but the fact that the book has received no discussion on reddit and in here concerns me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What does beginner mean to you? What physics courses have you taken? I would regard Kittel as an introductory book for solid state and Ashcroft as a more advanced book. I'm not sure I would expect a decent textbook to be easily understood. Any textbook will have you grappling with ideas and calculations you haven't been exposed to before. Never heard of Dekker, so can't help there, sorry.
 
  • #4
One book has never been enough for me.
There are cheap $20 to $40, new or second hand copies of both available.

Dekker is clearly old school and cheap, second hand or reprinted 2008.
https://www.bookfinder.com/search/?...=KJ5gumaVsN1YGWahLPYIXfbx6gU_1685574818_1:1:2

Kittel, in the 2018 edition, is more up to date.
https://www.bookfinder.com/search/?...e=introduction%20to%20solid%20state%20physics

At those prices, I could buy both, and a third, but I have electronic copies and a University library nearby.
 
  • #5
Haborix said:
I'm not sure I would expect a decent textbook to be easily understood. Any textbook will have you grappling with ideas and calculations you haven't been exposed to before.
Sir/Madam, I have one answer to that, Introduction to Electrodynamics by DJ Griffiths.

And as for textbook with unknown ideas and calculations, I am ok with that.

Meanwhile, since English is not my native language, I need it to be relatively simple to understand.
 
  • #6
  • #7
Baluncore said:
One book has never been enough for me.
There are cheap $20 to $40, new or second hand copies of both available.

Dekker is clearly old school and cheap, second hand or reprinted 2008.
https://www.bookfinder.com/search/?...=KJ5gumaVsN1YGWahLPYIXfbx6gU_1685574818_1:1:2

Kittel, in the 2018 edition, is more up to date.
https://www.bookfinder.com/search/?ac=sl&st=sl&ref=bf_s2_a1_t1_1&qi=s.Ga63WLa.2KmVGBFFxX,lbaoHs_1685575427_1:11:46&bq=author=charles%20kittel&title=introduction%20to%20solid%20state%20physics

At those prices, I could buy both, and a third, but I have electronic copies and a University library nearby.
Unfortunately as I am dealing with financial constraints, this has never been an option for me.
 
  • #8
There is an online version of the Dekker book here
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015002003716&view=1up&seq=1

The book you are considering was first written when I was a child. If it hasn't been updated for a while, it could easily be missing modern ideas.

I once had to teach a university course on Solid State Chemistry, a subject I had only ever done a single term course on 20 years earlier. The book that was suggested to me by another lecturer had several interesting things I had never been taught at all. ( A R West, Solid State Chemistry, an updated version / title change of which is available from amazon, while an copy from 1999 is quite cheap.)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

FAQ: Is Adrianus J. Dekker forgotten or irrelevant?

Who is Adrianus J. Dekker?

Adrianus J. Dekker was a prominent figure in the field of electrical engineering and telecommunications. He made significant contributions to the development of microwave technology and radar systems during the mid-20th century.

What were Adrianus J. Dekker's main contributions to science and technology?

Adrianus J. Dekker is best known for his work on microwave engineering and radar technology. He played a crucial role in advancing the understanding and application of microwave propagation, which had significant implications for both military and civilian communication systems.

Why might Adrianus J. Dekker be considered forgotten or irrelevant today?

Adrianus J. Dekker might be considered forgotten or irrelevant today because the rapid pace of technological advancement often overshadows earlier contributions. As new technologies emerge, the foundational work of past scientists can sometimes be overlooked, especially if it has been integrated and built upon over the years.

Are there any modern technologies that still rely on Dekker's work?

Yes, many modern technologies still rely on the foundational principles of microwave engineering and radar systems that Adrianus J. Dekker helped to develop. His work laid the groundwork for various applications in telecommunications, satellite communications, and even medical imaging technologies like MRI.

How can we ensure that contributions from scientists like Adrianus J. Dekker are remembered?

To ensure that contributions from scientists like Adrianus J. Dekker are remembered, it is important to include their work in educational curricula, celebrate their achievements through awards and recognitions, and maintain comprehensive historical records. Additionally, publicizing their contributions in popular science media can help keep their legacies alive.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
418
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top