Is All Magnetic Field Really Zero According to Maxwell's Equations?

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations indicate that the divergence of the magnetic field B is zero, leading to the conclusion that B can be expressed as the curl of another vector function A. This results in the application of Stokes' theorem, which suggests that the line integral of A around a closed path is also zero, implying that A is path independent. Consequently, it follows that A can be represented as the gradient of a scalar function ψ, leading to the conclusion that the magnetic field B must be zero. However, there is a concern regarding the application of Stokes' theorem in this context, as the region may not be simply connected. This raises questions about the validity of the proof and the assumptions made regarding the magnetic field.
typhoonss821
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
One of Maxwell's equations says that <br /> \nabla\cdot\vec{B}{=0}<br /> where B is any magnetic field.
Then using the divergence theore, we find
<br /> \int\int_S \vec{B}\cdot\hat{n}dS=\int\int\int_V \nabla\cdot\vec{B}dV=0<br />.

Because B has zero divergence, there must exist a vector function, say A, such that
<br /> \vec{B}=\nabla\times\vec{A}<br /> .
Combining these two equations, we get
<br /> \int\int_S \hat{n}\cdot\nabla\times\vec{A}dS=0<br /> .
Next we apply Stoke's theorem and the preceding result to find
<br /> \oint_C\vec{A}\cdot\hat{t}ds=\int\int_S\hat{n}\cdot\nabla\times\vec{A}dS=0<br /> .
Thus A is path independent. It follows that we can write
<br /> \vec{A}=\nabla\psi <br /> , where ψ is some scalar fution.

Since the curl of the gradient of a function is zero, we arrive at the remarkable fact that
<br /> \vec{B}=\nabla\times\nabla\psi=0<br />
that is, all magnetic field is zero!

Wow, there must be something wrong...

My thought is that we can not apply Stoke's theorem in this case because the region we discuss is not simply connected.

But I'm not sure if I am right, please help me check the proof^^
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The surface you use for the divergence theorem is a closed surface that encloses a volume. The surface is from the Stokes theorem is a surface that has the contour C as edge.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top