Is Artin's Algebra Book Suitable for Beginners?

Click For Summary
Artin's Algebra book can be challenging for students without prior experience in proof-based mathematics beyond calculus. It is advisable to complete at least an introductory proof-based course before tackling Abstract Algebra. Essential prerequisites include understanding mathematical induction, properties of integers, modular mathematics, equivalence relations, and functions. Familiarity with these concepts is crucial for success in a first course in abstract algebra. Additionally, taking a Linear Algebra class prior to Abstract Algebra is recommended, as it provides concrete applications and introduces abstract ideas, enhancing the understanding of non-commutative multiplication and proof techniques.
jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
How hard is Artin's Algebra book to understand? For a student who has not had any upper level (proof based) math classes beyond calculus, is it doable if you are sufficiently motivated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's recommended (and most likely mandatory) to have some short of proof based course (even be it just an introductory course) before taking Abstract Algebra.

for basic (first course) in abstract algebra, you'll need following:

- mathematical induction (along with proof by contradiction)
- basic properties of integers: well ordering principle, division algorithm, notion of gcd, fundamental theorem of arithmetic
- understanding of
- modular mathematics
- equivalence relations (along with partition)
- functions/mapping

if you are not familiar with 1/2 of the listed above, take a introductory proof based course first.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521597188/?tag=pfamazon01-20 is a good book for selective self-study as well as detailed reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suggest you take a Linear Algebra class and then Abstract Algebra. The linear algebra class has more concrete application and introduces some of the more abstract ideas such as non-commutative multiplication (AB not equal to BA). Also you'll get some experience with proofs. I'd recommend you take them back to back.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K