Is Asymmetry Momentum Transfer a Viable Concept for Space Propulsion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of asymmetry momentum transfer for space propulsion, specifically using a system of robot arms and a cannonball. Two cases are analyzed: in the first, momentum remains unchanged despite oscillations, while in the second, a turbine-like mechanism is proposed to extract kinetic energy from the cannonball, potentially reducing its momentum. However, the conservation of momentum principle indicates that such a system cannot produce net propulsion without violating established physical laws. The thread is ultimately locked due to the discussion of reactionless drives, which contravene the forum's posting policies. The concept remains unviable within the current understanding of physics.
terrance_teoh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Momentum Drive
===============
Just playing with some ideas on rocket propulsion in space based on asymmetry momentum transfer.
Any reason why this is not workable? :-p

1.
Let
m1 = 100 kg robot arm at one end of a cylinder;
m2 = 100 kg robot arm at opposite one end of the cylinder;
m3 = 10 kg canon ball;

2.
Case 1:
=======
Let m1 and m2 throw the canon ball between them.
The gain in movement is zero, although there should be some oscillation:
Mass Velocity Momentum Duration Distance Total Distance
==== ======== ======== ======== ======== ==============
i
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = 0 m/s; p1 = 0 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = 0 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = 0 m/s; p2 = 0 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 0 m/s; p3 = 0 kg m/s;

ii
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = -0.5 m/s; p1 = -50 kg m/s; t = 10 s; d = -5 m; d_sum = -5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = -0.5 m/s; p2 = -50 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 10 m/s; p3 = 100 kg m/s;

iii
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = 0 m/s; p1 = 0 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = -5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = 0 m/s; p2 = 0 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 0 m/s; p3 = 0 kg m/s;

iv
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = 0.5 m/s; p1 = 50 kg m/s; t = 10 s; d = 5 m; d_sum = 0 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = 0.5 m/s; p2 = 50 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = -10 m/s; p3 = -100 kg m/s;

v
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = 0 m/s; p1 = 0 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = 0 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = 0 m/s; p2 = 0 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 0 m/s; p3 = 0 kg m/s;


3.
Case 2:
=======
Let m1 and m2 throw the canon ball between them.
But this time place a revolving door like a turbine; when the cannon ball goes only from m1 to m2.
The idea is to drain the kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2) from the canon ball.
Let us assume we can take out about 51% of that energy.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_turbine#Efficiency)
This should slow down the cannon ball, hence reducing its momentum when it hits m2.
From the calculations below we can see that it is possible to convert energy to velocity and still recycle the mass being used for propulsion.

Mass Velocity Momentum Duration Distance Total Distance Energy
==== ======== ======== ======== ======== ============== ======
i
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = 0 m/s; p1 = 0 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = 0 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = 0 m/s; p2 = 0 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 0 m/s; p3 = 0 kg m/s;

ii
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = -0.5 m/s; p1 = -50 kg m/s; t = 10 s; d = -5 m; d_sum = -5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = -0.5 m/s; p2 = -50 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 10 m/s; p3 = 100 kg m/s;

e3 = 500 kg m2/s2

iii
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = -0.5 m/s; p1 = -50 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = -5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = -0.5 m/s; p2 = -50 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 7 m/s; p3 = 70 kg m/s;

e3 = 245 kg /s2;
Energy Drain = -255 kg m2/s2 (about 51%)

iv
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = -0.15 m/s; p1 = -15 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = -5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = -0.15 m/s; p2 = -15 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 0 m/s; p3 = 0 kg m/s;

v
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = 0.35 m/s; p1 = 35 kg m/s; t = 10 s; d = 3.5 m; d_sum = -1.5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = 0.35 m/s; p2 = 35 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = -10 m/s; p3 = -100 kg m/s;

vi
m1 = 100 kg; v1 = -0.15 m/s; p1 = -15 kg m/s; t = 0 s; d = 0 m; d_sum = -1.5 m
m2 = 100 kg; v2 = -0.15 m/s; p2 = -15 kg m/s;
m3 = 10 kg; v3 = 0 m/s; p3 = 0 kg m/s;

Note:
=====
p = mv;
e = 0.5mv^2;
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is always conserved. It seems likely that you have ignored the momentum going into the revolving door.
 
terrance_teoh said:
Just playing with some ideas on rocket propulsion in space based on asymmetry momentum transfer.
Any reason why this is not workable? :-p

Conservation of momentum. Reactionless drives are similar to perpetual motion/free energy devices in that it requires breaking known scientific laws. That means it violates PF posting policy, and because of this I am locking the thread.

Please see the Terms and Guidelines page for more information on what is and isn't allowed here on the site.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top