Is ATF DW-1 Specification Truly Proprietary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter YoshiMoshi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Modern vehicle manufacturers often recommend using proprietary fluids, despite not producing them in-house, which raises questions about specifications like Acura's DW-1. The DW-1 specification appears to be proprietary, as it is difficult to find detailed information or compatible non-branded ATF options. This situation suggests a trend where manufacturers create unique specifications to compel customers to purchase branded fluids at higher prices. While some users report that other brands work well, the lack of accessible DW-1 specifications complicates trust in alternatives. The discussion highlights concerns over fluid compatibility and the implications of proprietary specifications in the automotive industry.
YoshiMoshi
Messages
233
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
ATF DW-1 SPEC = Proprietary?
I see modern vehicle manufacturers recommend using only "their" fluids in their cars. Even though vehicle manufacturers don't make their own fluids, and someone else makes it for them. Presumably to some requirements specification, and testing procedures. Gone are the days of just using any 5W-30 oil in your engine it seems.

Anyways, I have an Acura that is about 10 years old. It says to only use Acura DW-1 in the transmission. The thought process in the first paragraph, and trying to do a search for the DW-1 specification, has lead me to believe that the DW-1 specification is proprietary? I can't seem to find the DW-1 specification. Yet I see none Honda/Acura branded ATF at part stores claim to be compatible with DW-1. But how can this be if the DW-1 specification is proprietary? How can I trust these none Honda/Acura branded ATF to be compatible with DW-1 if the specification is proprietary?

Seems like we now live in the day of, lets create our own requirements specifications for our fluids, that are probably not far off from other commercial fluids, and we will keep the specification proprietary and put in service information to only use our fluids? Now our customers will have no choice but to pay extra for fluids with our logo on it.

If the DW-1 specification is not proprietary, can someone please post a link to it? I can't find it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet), for DW-1, which lists the ingredients, is at:
https://www.collegehillshonda.com/sds/08200-9008sds.pdf
(above found with:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=08200-9008+MSDS)

A search finds many sources at various prices:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=dw-1+transmission+fluid+napa
Also try leaving the "+napa" off the end.

Its main Claim-To-Fame seems to be somewhat lower viscosity that leads to smoother shifting.

Some user sites that showed up claim that other brands "work fine."

Cheers,
Tom
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top