Is Casamir Effect Related to Anti-Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter debra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anti-matter
debra
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
I have been reading round the Casamir Effect and Diracs vacuum field.

On the one hand it appears to be a straightforward classical Van Der Waals forces concept related to capillary action and surface tension (duh), on the other hand I read that the Casamir effect is a possible method to produce anti-matter (what??)!

So I am confused.

Any takers to clear this up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
debra said:
I have been reading round the Casamir Effect and Diracs vacuum field.

On the one hand it appears to be a straightforward classical Van Der Waals forces concept related to capillary action and surface tension (duh), on the other hand I read that the Casamir effect is a possible method to produce anti-matter (what??)!

So I am confused.

Any takers to clear this up?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

It is a result of quantization of the field between the plates. It has nothing to do with anti-matter.
 
I read some materials arguing on people can use it to produce anti-gravity... Maybe you need to post your original reading materials here, so that we can analyze whether the argument is reasonable or not.
 
Yes, it does not seem exotic enough for anti-particles. But reading around the Casamir Effect I came across http://www.mendeley.com/research/antimatter-production-at-a-potential-boundary/

Which states: "The use of the Casimir effect to suppress local vacuum fields is presented as a possible technique for generating the sharp potential gradients required for particle-antiparticle pair creation.

How do they arrive at that conclusion? - it was a funded research suggestion I believe.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
42
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
179
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
23K
Back
Top