Is Cos(pi(2x+1)) the Key to Simplifying the Search for x Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karma
  • Start date Start date
Karma
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
sec(pi)=2/2x+1
-1=2/2x+1
-2x-1=2
-2x=3
x=-3/2

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is the original supposed to be sec(pi)(2x+1) = 2?
 
sec(pi(2x+1)=2

the original
 
That doesn't make any sense. You have two "(" and only one ")".
The whole question is whether you mean sec(pi(2x+1))= 2 or sec(pi(2x)+ 1= 2 and you still haven't answered that.
 
sec(pi(2x+1))= 2 is what i mean.
 
Karma said:
sec(pi(2x+1))= 2 is what i mean.

So cos(pi(2x+1)) = ? Does that suggest an easier way to search for the values of x?
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top