Is Dirac's Sea Still Relevant in Modern Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter debra
  • Start date Start date
debra
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Is Dirac's Sea entirely discounted now?

He did predict positrons - that were later found. And mirrors have been shown to produce photons from a vacuum which is pretty weird.

There seems to be a flurry of activity in this area of physics caused by computers hitting Casimir Effect problems in sensors that are so small that Casimir forces prevent their perfect functioning. Also as clock speeds increase more of these effects can occur.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes its dead now - QFT has replaced it, makes exactly the same predictions such as antimatter (directly - no sea required) but without the problems of negative mass.

Thanks
Bill
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top