I Is E<mc^2 Critical for the Klein Paradox in Potential Step Analysis?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joker93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Klein Paradox
Joker93
Messages
502
Reaction score
37
Hello!
I am trying to work out the various cases for the potential step problem in the context of the Klein Gordon equation.

I was wondering if one must consider the situation where E<mc^2 when working out the situation of
E-mc^2 <V< E+mc^2 where V is the value of the potential after the step.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is important to consider the situation where E<mc^2 when working out the potential step problem in the context of the Klein Gordon equation. This is because if E<mc^2, then the particle will not be able to tunnel through the potential barrier. In this case, the wave function must be reflected and not transmitted.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Back
Top