Courses Is Grad-Level E&M a Risk for a Serious Physics Student?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yeshuamo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate student seeking advice about switching to a graduate-level E&M course to improve their academic profile for graduate school applications. The student is concerned about the risk of receiving a grade lower than an A and is considering which 400-level courses to drop. A key point raised is the importance of consulting an academic advisor to assess their academic standing and the competitiveness of their graduate program. The responses emphasize that without understanding the student's background and goals, it's difficult to provide specific advice on course selection. Ultimately, engaging with an advisor is crucial for making informed decisions about course load and graduate school preparation.
yeshuamo
Messages
39
Reaction score
6
I am an undergraduate with 3 more semesters left and with the majority of my physics core complete, except for quantum theory. I'd like to give my best effort to entering a top graduate school, but I got B marks in E&M I and Classical Mechanics. This semester was a turnaround, with straight A's, including E&M II (which I loved.)

I think that getting an A in grad-level E&M could demonstrate that I know physics core well before entering a PhD program. Question is, how much would I risk getting a grade below an A with a good prof?

And if I do switch into the grad-level course, could you please suggest which of these 400 level courses I can drop as the most "useless" for a serious physics student?

- Theoretical Astrophysics II in the Astro department
- Ordinary Differential Equations II with Stability Theory
- Applied Partial Differential Equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeshuamo said:
I am an undergraduate with 3 more semesters left and with the majority of my physics core complete, except for quantum theory. I'd like to give my best effort to entering a top graduate school, but I got B marks in E&M I and Classical Mechanics. This semester was a turnaround, with straight A's, including E&M II (which I loved.)

I think that getting an A in grad-level E&M could demonstrate that I know physics core well before entering a PhD program. Question is, how much would I risk getting a grade below an A with a good prof?

And if I do switch into the grad-level course, could you please suggest which of these 400 level courses I can drop as the most "useless" for a serious physics student?

- Theoretical Astrophysics II in the Astro department
- Ordinary Differential Equations II with Stability Theory
- Applied Partial Differential Equations.

I will ask this same question as I've asked repeatedly to all the other posts of this type: Have you discussed this exact issue with your academic advisor?!

For some odd reason, members who post this type of question have often neglected to inform us if he/she (i) has talked to an academic advisor, (ii) if yes, what was the response, and (iii) if no, why not?

The reason for this is (i) we do not know how good of a student you are. We don't know if you are an "A"-averaged student, a "B"-averaged students, or if you are teetering on passing and failing. (ii) we don't know how strong of a competition or the caliber of the graduate students you will have in those graduate classes, and (iii) do you need to boost your GPA so that you can get into more competitive graduate schools?

These are the type of 2-way communications that you need to have with the person who will give you such advice that you are seeking.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
I will ask this same question as I've asked repeatedly to all the other posts of this type: Have you discussed this exact issue with your academic advisor?!

For some odd reason, members who post this type of question have often neglected to inform us if he/she (i) has talked to an academic advisor, (ii) if yes, what was the response, and (iii) if no, why not?

The reason for this is (i) we do not know how good of a student you are. We don't know if you are an "A"-averaged student, a "B"-averaged students, or if you are teetering on passing and failing. (ii) we don't know how strong of a competition or the caliber of the graduate students you will have in those graduate classes, and (iii) do you need to boost your GPA so that you can get into more competitive graduate schools?

These are the type of 2-way communications that you need to have with the person who will give you such advice that you are seeking.

Zz.
Thanks, Zz. I got this idea after the end of the semester - so no, I have not discussed the question with my advisor.

If we rightfully set aside the question of my past and future GPA and aptitude, have you any input on the usefulness of the Astro and two math courses I listed above?
 
yeshuamo said:
Thanks, Zz. I got this idea after the end of the semester - so no, I have not discussed the question with my advisor.

If we rightfully set aside the question of my past and future GPA and aptitude, have you any input on the usefulness of the Astro and two math courses I listed above?

It will be irresponsible for me to offer such an advice, because (i) I don't know how strong your background is in taking those courses (ii) I don't know what you intend to do in graduate school (ii) I don't know how useful those courses are with what you are hoping to do.

Zz.
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
981
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top