Is it normal to forget most previously learned material?

[Tosh5457]

Every semester, whenever I begin to learn a new subject, that is, a more advanced class of the previous subject (i.e. algebra -> pre-calc -> calc -> diff eq, etc.) I forget a lot of the stuff I learned in the previous class when I'm learning the new content and constantly have to review all the time because I keep forgetting the basics and it's interfering with the more advanced classes...is this normal or should I hammer the bases more into my head so I will never forget them and not have to look back every time I need a formula or theorem and whatnot?

Hmm I usually remember at least the most important things, but some things I forget and I have to give a quick review. I think you should pay more attention to the bases (for example in multivariate calculus: chain rule, stokes theorem, gauss theorem; in linear algebra: vector space, basis of a vector space, eigenvalues and eigenvectors, homogeneous system and determinant).

 

[Nano-Passion]

My method is not cheating in any way, shape, or form. And once again I said I'm not smart enough to understand all the material in a deep enough manner in a short time frame and be able to live with sanity

Your not smart enough is different from your not dedicated enough. The first is a victim statement and a very passive philosophy-- I loathe it. The latter blames oneself for not trying hard enough. Which philosophy do you choose to be under? One thing for sure, if you choose to fall under the philosophy that you aren't smart enough, then you will never reach your potential.

I thought algebra was hard and didn't make any sense two years ago. Now I'm studying differential equations in my spare time. I could have went two routes: either I wasn't smart enough, or I wasn't dedicated enough.

You choose.

 

[member 392791]

Yeah you have a point I hate what I'm doing, but I'm getting the marks and I just want a high paying job. If I followed what I really liked I would be making $30,000 a year, and that is just not reasonable. I'm also not dedicated enough, I've repeatedly said I refuse to study 8 hours a day to meet the expectations. Maybe for some people it takes less time, but for me there is no way.

 

[Jorriss]

The teacher's give the student's back the tests. These are not tests that the teacher takes back and you don't get to see ever again. I just know how to make friends with older people than me and get them to give me all their old tests and labs. I'm already set up with tests and labs for chemistry II and tommorow will be set up with tests for linear algebra/DE

I figured the teacher gives them back. Its still considered cheating. Personally, I don't care, but it is cheating at many, many institutions.

 

[Mholnic-]

Woopy, I took a look at some of your other posts. You're clearly having a hard time picking a major and further you state that you never really had an interest in medicine, you're bored in your math/physics classes and with the finer details of biology. You prefer the macroscopic to the microscopic, animal behavior to molecules and you're already talking about burnout.

Why, then, become a doctor? The money? I don't see any other reason. Think about this, though -- how do you intend to get through Chem II, OChem I & II and Biology with that mindset? How will you not burn out if you're taking subjects you hate... biochem, microbiology, immunology, genetics, etc? And that's just your undergrad career. You'd still need to get into medical school (good luck acing the MCAT if you've forgotten everything a week after each final) and THROUGH medical school. That means more classes about subjects you hate and can't be bothered to remember.

Even if you do make it into/through med school and into an internship and residency.. how will you hide your flagrant ignorance when they tell you to do something and you don't have a friend there to give you the answers? Like you said you've deceived your teachers into thinking you're smart, you've tricked them into thinking you know what you're talking about -- but more than that you've deceived yourself.

You've convinced yourself that you'll get some dream job where people will pay you 2-3 times as much as they pay everyone else.. for what? Think about it. What are they paying you for? They're paying you for knowledge, a skill-set, abilities that other people don't have. If being or becoming a doctor was easy, everyone would do it.. and a lot of people try. Compare the number of hopeful, save-the-world and buy-the-lexus "premeds" to the number of people entering good med schools with 4.0 science GPAs (rather than 4.0 English) to the number leaving med school with equally impressive resumes.

Most wash out. While you're at it, read up on some of the recent news stories surrounding the realities of law school.. the fact that people are entering with dreams and leaving with debt. They're being told that lawyer = money, they're NOT being told that this is only true for the best students at the best schools who know the best people. Read up on the classes required for EE and you'll see why your friend studies so hard to get those As.

Do the research, understand that things get harder and if you're not willing to put in the hours (as you've clearly stated you want to give up after 10 minutes of studying) you will not make it. Doing what you dream and making $30,000 is better than failing out of med school with a few hundred thousand in debt. Alternatively you could get your **** together, realize that money doesn't come easy and put in the time to study.

 

[member 392791]

you make it sound like I'm struggling. I have nearly a 4.0 GPA in a science major, I just absolutely hate it. The jobs are in science. Also, I know I'm not the only one doing this. You expect me to believe the entire country of India and China have an intense interest in medicine or engineering? There is absolutely no way.

If I loved the subject, I could study all those hours with no problem. She loves science, I don't. Just because I don't love a subject that earns a lot of money doesn't mean I'm not going to live poor the rest of my life. Good snide remark to the english majors that truly love whatever it is their doing, you should be encouraging me to network even more

 

[Mholnic-]

I don't mean to imply that you're struggling, only that in time you will with your attitude. In a previous thread (March 15) you spoke of burnout, of switching subjects after 10 minutes and of being in Physics I/Chem I, meaning you have another semester of Physics, another semester of general Chemistry and 2 semesters of Organic Chemistry ahead of you.. in addition to the rest of the Biology classes needed for a degree. Immunology, Microbiology, Biochemistry, A&P, etc.

I don't believe you'll make it through them without quitting with your currentmindset and your developing study habits. Interestingly enough this ties in with your comment on foreigners in science programs; their interest isn't necessary, but they possesses the work ethic required to master the material. You seem to think it's not necessary, and it'll bite you in the *** in time. Which is essentially what everyone else has been saying.

Intellect alone won't get you very far, you need determination and work ethic as well; hell, with enough of the latter two you don't even need to be all that smart. Interest is preferable but.. well, as you pointed out it's not required. The problem is that your willingness to work (study) seems to be faltering almost as quickly as your interest is. Unless that changes, you'll be changing your major again. Imho.

Edit: My remark about English majors was in reference to the aspiring doctors that major in something easy to keep their GPA high after they realize that it's not as easy as they thought to maintain a 4.0 through science courses and labs designed to weed out those who aren't willing to put in the requisite study time. Courses that, by the sound of it, you haven't started yet. Calc III is great, but you still have lots of Chem/Bio left.

 

[member 392791]

I already know I'm a ticking timebomb, but I feel like I'm in a hopeless situation between being miserable in my studies or being miserable being poor. Which misery would you choose? one is temporary and the other lasts a lifetime

 

[gravenewworld]

Hate biology? Just wait until medical school level human anatomy, cell biology, genetics, and biochemistry.

 

[some_letters]

I'm not so convinced. With your mentality I envision you on the unemployment line and voting for the president who supports food stamps.

Can someone please explain to me what is so wrong with foodstamps?! I've always been under the impression that they help save lives.

edit: This has nothing to do with the thread. perhaps a pm would be more appropriate.

 

[M83]

or being miserable being poor.

Money is not the be-all, end-all of your life. If that's your only motivation for being in college then you're most likely going to quit and end up working at a low rate job paying off your debt. If you hate academia so much, but want to be rich then why not become a businessman? You seem to be doing it the hard way as far as making a lot of money is concerned.

EDIT: I'm sure a lot of people will attest to this on this forum, but being in college full-time is like having a full-time job.

 

[Nano-Passion]

Can someone please explain to me what is so wrong with foodstamps?! I've always been under the impression that they help save lives.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with them. You misinterpreted. What I was saying is that he isn't going to be the next president but will either be unemployed or on welfare.

 

[some_letters]

There is absolutely nothing wrong with them. You misinterpreted. What I was saying is that he isn't going to be the next president but will either be unemployed or on welfare.

And then in the next post went on to call him an elitist. Chill out, man

 

[some_letters]

Money is not the be-all, end-all of your life. If that's your only motivation for being in college then you're most likely going to quit and end up working at a low rate job paying off your debt. If you hate academia so much, but want to be rich then why not become a businessman? You seem to be doing it the hard way as far as making a lot of money is concerned.

EDIT: I'm sure a lot of people will attest to this on this forum, but being in college full-time is like having a full-time job.

I agree with this. You seem to have a knack for networking already, why not major in something along those lines?

 

[Mholnic-]

I already know I'm a ticking timebomb, but I feel like I'm in a hopeless situation between being miserable in my studies or being miserable being poor. Which misery would you choose? one is temporary and the other lasts a lifetime

That's sort of our point. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your argument(s), but from where I'm sitting it seems as if you're... well, perhaps not arguing in favor of poor study habits in general but at the very least defending your study habits specifically. I don't mean to suggest that you have to switch majors, only that you change those habits lest you be forced to switch when your disinterest catches up with you in the next few semesters/years of chemistry and biology.

Some part of me would love to be majoring in languages or philosophy, but I chose the more difficult of my many and varied interests... physics. Not the most profitable, if that were the case I'd have gone with engineering. I did this because while I believe myself capable of succeeding in more difficult upper-graduate classes (time will tell if this is the case), I don't think this would be the case if I chose a field I had zero interest in. See, I recognized that it wouldn't simply be 4 years of pain.. but a lifetime. If I hated <Field X> in university I'd likely hate it as a career as well.

This is the dilemma you're facing now. Perhaps you could consider other fields that you find more interesting; fields that, while not being as lucrative as medicine, offer a reasonable salary after graduation. Mathematics, economics, computer science, physics, engineering (so many to choose from!), etc. There is more to success than medical and law school. Springs and planes are just elementary ways to teach physical concepts, concepts which are applied in upper level courses that teach you to design aircraft or improve fuels. You would know better than we would what you might enjoy doing in your later years.. after that it's simply a matter of putting your head down and doing what needs to be done.

 

[member 392791]

This has been my ''plan'' so far. Since I speak english way better than 80% of my classmates and can do the science/math part I hope enough to atleast get through a program, I would get into a job that requires scientific knowledge and would appreciate qualities such as understanding english and networking (patent law). 80% of my classmates are no longer competition for me since they don't have the necessary language skills to even do the job, they can only do the engineering part. Then I get to be a laywer that makes more than an engineer would.

 

[mesa]

I blame the education system being so rote. Maybe if they tested concepts instead of memorizing cookbook steps to answering anything my ploys wouldn't work. I am the first to admit I have no idea what Green's theorem is, but I did it on my final today and computed it correctly, all I did was follow the steps as done on previous quizzes. Easiest A in my life

oh yeah, and stop putting so much pressure on me to get all A's and maybe I wouldn't cheat the system. Professional school's emphasize A's a lot more than understanding the concept, so I'm just doing what I got to do to get a secure high paying job.

Don't blame me.

And i'll be doing the same exact thing next semester in differential equations

I can kind of relate to this; recently I made some major changes in my life and sold my company so I could go back to school and be a better dad.

Each day during nap time I spend several hours really digging into what is being taught in the classroom consuming countless notebooks along the way. It's been an amazing journey, but I can relate to how this person feels.

We seem to be in an era of universities becoming diploma mills that are more concerned about appearances than the knowledge engrained in their graduates. I've seen skyrocketing tuition, ridiculously large class sizes, and a lot of burnt out professor's that are intentionally kept part-time to reduce costs so the top admins can enjoy their half a million dollar salaries and nearly 3/4 of a million dollar bonuses.

Teachers willing to put in the time to really help their students should be rewarded with the promise of full time pay and benefits while those that are only popular because they give lots of A's should be part time or let go instead of the reverse.

I am sorry to rant, but it upsets me to see good professors stuck in the mud while the bozo's get the few scarce full time appointments just because they fill up their classrooms.

I loved many of my teachers and I hope for change.
It would be a tragedy to lose them.

 

[xdrgnh]

If you hate what you are doing you won't do well in it period. Also because of the responsibilities of being a doctor I wouldn't want someone that hates being a doctor to have my life in his or hers hand. How can you be a lawyer if you don't remember the result of historic cases or even memorize the law? Again why would I hire a Lawyer if I know the Lawyer hates being a Lawyer. If you hate what you are doing then you are better just getting a Associates degree and leave college to start up your own business. You would save more money and probably make more also. Employers don't care about a degree. They care about what you can do. If you demonstrate you can't do anything even with a degree you won't get the job.

 

[xdrgnh]

For me I do sort of have this problem with math mostly. I only remember the math that I use in my physics. Like I took LA and don't remember much from it because I'm not using any of it in my physics even though I know it has applications QM but I'm not taking QM so I forgot. Like I remember all of the stuff from vector calc because I use it often and I can tie it in with physical applications. Even the stuff from Complex Variables I remember pretty well. But stuff from DE I don't because those kind of DE don't come up in the physics I take.

 

[bcbwilla]

with my mentality, you'll probably see me on the presidential election ballot in about 15-20 years. scary thought huh?

Please do check back in on the forums in a few years. I'd love to hear about how you're doing.

 

[Nano-Passion]

And then in the next post went on to call him an elitist. Chill out, man

I said he was being elitist. Either way:

"She will be very successful one day (electrical engineer), and if I keep up what I'm doing and it keeps working, I will be a lawyer or doctor one day. We will be fine financially, only difference is I put in 1/10th the effort and still get 2-3 times the pay. My way is more efficient."

Is an elitist statement. He openly admitted of cheating and bragged that he will put in 1/10th the effort yet get 2-3 times the pay. Why are you taking it personally?

 

[qwe25hkl2]

I will only add one more reply to the original question.

As far as I know, memory works not only by repetition but also by connections. I think it's useful not only to repeat the same material from the same textbooks and lecture notes, but also to find new perspectives on the same topics, to read other textbooks - perhaps, on a more advanced level or on closely related subjects. So, you increase networks of knowledge items, which are stronger than isolated items, and each of these items helps to remember the others.

Also, memory works by emotions. Talking about the topic with other people, trying to solve challenging problems and to answer exciting questions may help.

 

[bcbwilla]

As far as I know, memory works not only by repetition but also by connections. I think it's useful not only to repeat the same material from the same textbooks and lecture notes, but also to find new perspectives on the same topics, to read other textbooks - perhaps, on a more advanced level or on closely related subjects. So, you increase networks of knowledge items, which are stronger than isolated items, and each of these items helps to remember the others.

I just took a solid state physics course and we made heavy use of concept mapping. It is very helpful and can be applied to just about anything, so I'd encourage others to try it.

 

[mathwonk]

several of the people responding to this thread sort of remind me of the hopeless students i was talking about having to deal with. this thread has gone pitifully downhill. i apologize if my griping was responsible for that. But there is almost no useful advice being offered here now.

 

[mesa]

several of the people responding to this thread sort of remind me of the hopeless students i was talking about having to deal with. this thread has gone pitifully downhill. i apologize if my griping was responsible for that. But there is almost no useful advice being offered here now.

I can see how some of the OP's comments can insight some unproductive responses but I think there is, at the very least, honesty in his statements.

What do you think the OP should do?

 

[RoshanBBQ]

To woopy:
You have to remember the classes you are taking right now are easy pieces of cake. If what you say is true, there will be classes in the future difficult enough where even viewing the solutions of old tests will not help. I also find it odd your classes have such identical tests. I know some of my classes do, but all of them? No way.

on topic:
Forgetting a lot of specific solutions and a lot of memory-based stuff is normal. But it's forgotten in such a way where you realize you need to know it. For example, if I forgot exactly what the time shift property is of the Fourier transform and I encounter it in a class, I will still remember: "I need to use this property that I've forgotten." Then it takes about 5 seconds on Google or 2 minutes finding and looking it up in a book to acquire what I need. And if I notice a whole topic in a new class completely hinges on some forgotten skill from another class (e.g. perhaps I need to be able to do Fourier transforms in general), a small 20 minute review of the material should bring me up to speed -- the worst case scenario being I need to reread parts of a textbook for an hour or so (e.g. rereading, and skipping parts I know I know, a chapter on Fourier transforms).

edit: Though, there are certain types of information that are so fundamental I think it is a bit ridiculous to forget. What that material is changes from degree to degree. An example would be basic differentiation and integration. Or despite me using it as an example of what has been forgotten, for EE, forgetting Fourier transforms is a bit ridiculous. I have the entire tables in my head. When I was in a stochastic processes course for engineers, my eyes lit up when I saw we were doing frequency stuff since it's so fresh in my mind. I even got a problem 'wrong' in the class since the TA and no one else in the course remembered the impulse scaling property. Since I secured a near 100 in the course, I never bothered bringing it up, though I felt a bit like injustice had transpired on that day. And this TA was a holder of a prestigious fellowship at my university. He should have known better.

 

[Shaun_W]

I forget most of what I've learned immediately after the exam! Things that I got As in, the next semester I had absolutely no idea of even the fundamentals of.

It's all about how you learn. If you rote learn the exams then you'll naturally forget much of what you've learned and be unable to apply the knowledge in any situation outside of the exam questions you've been practising.

I'd say that most students do this, and the education system (at least in the UK) actively encourages it. Firstly, that's likely exactly how your teachers got through their exams, then secondly when you get to university, lecturers vary rarely have time for undergraduate students because that's not what they're paid for.

But the end results are the same; the student who rote learns a few days before the exam gets an A as does the student who spends the entire semester studying and actively learning the material. Universities don't give a damn about creating forms of assessment that can weed out those who actually understand the material from those who just learn to answer exam papers, so why should students give a damn about learning it? Most students don't like their subject anyway, they only chose it because they hated it the least or have been told it was respected and have noticed that almost every single job nowadays requires a degree. And for most jobs it doesn't matter whether you understand your subject or whether you rote learned it, it's nothing more than a certificate that the company use to filter out those who have one from those who don't.

I see a lot of people are raging at Woopydalan because he admits he rote learns, doesn't study much during term time and doesn't really give a damn about the material being taught. I can understand why people who have a passion for maths, physics, chemistry etc. are not happy at this, but Woopydalan is typical of modern students. Woopydalan also demonstrates understanding of how to play or cheat the system, and this alone is something that is highly sought after by many businesses. I'd much rather employ someone who can get the same results but with much, much less time spent.

Overall it's not the fault of students or university lecturers that this goes on but it's the government's for trying to cram so many people into university and industry's for stopping recruiting non-graduates.

 

[deluks917]

I only really remember what I have learned if I work through it in detail from the beginning.

 

[genericusrnme]

I didn't read through this whole thread but one thing I've noticed is that a lot of people think that lecturers are there to learn for them and that they don't have to put much effort in on their end or think that taking notes (even following those set layouts they teach now that are supposed to 'maximise' your retention or some other rubbish) constitutes learning and understanding.

Since I started focusing on education and started teaching myself material outside of classes I found that I've never had a problem with remembering stuff I've covered previously (even stuff from the first chapter of a book I may have started to read before deciding that it wasn't suitable).

I agree with what Shaun_W says

I'd say that most students do this, and the education system (at least in the UK) actively encourages it.

A lot of the time you are taught to pass exams rather than understand material, you're even encouraged to guess on multiple choice questions because 'theres a 1 in n chance you'll get a mark'.

The rest I don't agree with, why would you want to employ someone who, instead of knowing what they should know, has to look everything up and only knows how to work with it if you give them a week or so to prepare, I'd rather have someone who knows what they're doing straight away.

 

[Illuminerdi]

When I was younger, I used to have this problem, as well. I don't anymore, though. The key thing to remember is math, but don't just memorize formulas. You should memorize, abstractly, how to problem-solve and derive everything instantaneously on your own.

In the sciences, virtually every law of nature can be described with a differential equation, so you only have to commit one form of said equation to memory, making your memory much more efficient. (i.e., ∑F=ma for deriving simple harmonic oscillations, falling motion, etc.)

 

[jk]

To the OP, good luck getting through upper division classes and medical school using your strategy

 

[smashbrohamme]

Honestly, what difference does it make?

If the kid is smart enough to memorize tests then he will be smart enough to learn from "On the Job Training"

He may not realize it; but he is studying; he just has a slight advantage because he knows exactly what the test is going to be on. He is not completely taking old tests and getting A's. He has to be putting in some work.

Half the engineer's we hire have to get specialized/trained for months in a general area anyways before they become productive. I never see any of them whip out old math theorems to learn something on the job; lol. You really think electrical engineer's are breaking out a pencil/pad instead of a fluke meter?

We use programs to number crunch. I don't even want to start listing electrical software programs that completely do everything for you.

Anyone remember HTML? Guess what we use now?

Drafting with a board and T-square...Pro/E and Catia all day baby! and I can manipulate it however I want. You want a 3/4 hole there? no problem..done in 3 seconds..you want me to make you a assembly drawing with a exploded view at a certain orientation showing transparent backup geometry? Drafting T-square..a week project...I can do it in 10 minutes in Pro/E...

Want me to run kinematics? How about I route a cable through resistors using logical references on a imported wirelist using E3??

You go ahead and paper and pencil it; I will be out in the field prototyping my designs while you double check your equations! :)

By the way to the kid who says he can pass from using old tests...that won't fly in the later classes; so you better start learning what a 8 hour study session is.

 

[genericusrnme]

Honestly, what difference does it make?

If the kid is smart enough to memorize tests then he will be smart enough to learn from "On the Job Training"

He may not realize it; but he is studying; he just has a slight advantage because he knows exactly what the test is going to be on. He is not completely taking old tests and getting A's. He has to be putting in some work.

Half the engineer's we hire have to get specialized/trained for months in a general area anyways before they become productive. I never see any of them whip out old math theorems to learn something on the job; lol. You really think electrical engineer's are breaking out a pencil/pad instead of a fluke meter?

We use programs to number crunch. I don't even want to start listing electrical software programs that completely do everything for you.

Anyone remember HTML? Guess what we use now?

Drafting with a board and T-square...Pro/E and Catia all day baby! and I can manipulate it however I want. You want a 3/4 hole there? no problem..done in 3 seconds..you want me to make you a assembly drawing with a exploded view at a certain orientation showing transparent backup geometry? Drafting T-square..a week project...I can do it in 10 minutes in Pro/E...

Want me to run kinematics? How about I route a cable through resistors using logical references on a imported wirelist using E3??

You go ahead and paper and pencil it; I will be out in the field prototyping my designs while you double check your equations! :)

By the way to the kid who says he can pass from using old tests...that won't fly in the later classes; so you better start learning what a 8 hour study session is.

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here...

 

[RoshanBBQ]

I didn't read through this whole thread but one thing I've noticed is that a lot of people think that lecturers are there to learn for them and that they don't have to put much effort in on their end or think that taking notes (even following those set layouts they teach now that are supposed to 'maximise' your retention or some other rubbish) constitutes learning and understanding.

Since I started focusing on education and started teaching myself material outside of classes I found that I've never had a problem with remembering stuff I've covered previously (even stuff from the first chapter of a book I may have started to read before deciding that it wasn't suitable).

I agree with what Shaun_W saysA lot of the time you are taught to pass exams rather than understand material, you're even encouraged to guess on multiple choice questions because 'theres a 1 in n chance you'll get a mark'.

The rest I don't agree with, why would you want to employ someone who, instead of knowing what they should know, has to look everything up and only knows how to work with it if you give them a week or so to prepare, I'd rather have someone who knows what they're doing straight away.

I have for a long time thought students who could easily make As get Bs or lower because they don't read the textbook and only use the lectures! Though I didn't immediately materialize it to apply to this topic at hand, I have to say I agree with this.

The kinds of things I forget are the kinds I studied just to get over with them and out of necessity (i.e. I didn't like power in EE, so I studied for the A but have since forgotten most of the theory) whereas things I studied out of interest I remember much more (i.e. I liked pattern recognition).

I think the lecturer observation is a symptom instead of a cause. The real cause is enthusiasm of the material. So in a sense, if someone only attends lectures, it's plausible they don't really have interest in the material, explaining why they don't study it enthusiastically after class. The prior statement brings about two explanations of lower memory retention: lower amounts of studying AND lower amounts of enthusiasm while studying. I studied A LOT for power electronics just to get the A, but the efficiency was brought down by how bored I was with it (low enthusiasm) -- as well as the retention afterward. My goals while doing HW in that class were to solve all possible problems likely on a test. Once I felt I gained that knowledge, I promptly stopped studying. For classes I enjoy, my goals are to see what cool things I can learn, meaning I try to reach a deeper level of understanding beyond what is needed on a test just out of joy. The efficiency of studying as well as retention after studying amplify due to my desires.

 

[PhizKid]

I can see how some of the OP's comments can insight some unproductive responses but I think there is, at the very least, honesty in his statements.

What do you think the OP should do?

To the OP, good luck getting through upper division classes and medical school using your strategy

It seems my thread has been hijacked as I am no longer the OP, I guess...