- #71
Dmitry67
- 2,567
- 1
1. I need to think about Demystifier's argument before I reply.
2. Yes, it is obvious that I like MWI, like it is obvious that you hate it. But how does it change the facts and observations?
I talk about observations (post #69, item B), I ask you about wha is not in agreement with the observations? You reply in emotional manner about 'love' and 'hatred'. If your statement is refuted on page N, you simply repeat it on page N+1!
It was show in this thread that this logic is WRONG! There are many things science can't explain, but it does not make it "wrong". Demystifier had provided an example in post #20. Did it help?
2. Yes, it is obvious that I like MWI, like it is obvious that you hate it. But how does it change the facts and observations?
I talk about observations (post #69, item B), I ask you about wha is not in agreement with the observations? You reply in emotional manner about 'love' and 'hatred'. If your statement is refuted on page N, you simply repeat it on page N+1!
Right now science is telling us MWI can't make sense of Born Rule, thus must be wrong!
It was show in this thread that this logic is WRONG! There are many things science can't explain, but it does not make it "wrong". Demystifier had provided an example in post #20. Did it help?