Is Newton's Third Law always true in every scenario?

AI Thread Summary
Forces are not always exactly opposite in all scenarios, particularly in curved spacetime or when considering magnetic forces between charged particles. While Newton's third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, this principle can be nuanced by the conservation of momentum in certain contexts. In cases involving electric and magnetic fields, the forces may not appear equal and opposite, yet momentum is still conserved. The discussion also touches on the validity of Newton's three laws of motion, emphasizing their general applicability to motion. Overall, the relationship between forces and motion can be complex and context-dependent.
treborly45
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Are the forces ALWAYS exactly opposite of each other?

Is there a way to accelerate a mass upwards, while having the "recoil" force travel on a horizontal plan or somehow completely eliminated?


Any and all information concerning this is much appreciated.

Rob
 
Science news on Phys.org
Maybe events in curved spacetime would violate "equal and opposite." Otherwise, in our everyday Euclidean, inertial space, the law holds.
 
That's actually not quite true. The real content of the third law is the conservation of momentum; but, there are situations where the momentum of some third thing is relevant, without exactly being able to talk about a force.

The classic example of this is the magnetic force. If you consider two charged particles moving paths that intersect at a right angle, for example, you'll find that the magnetic forces on them are not equal and opposite. This seeming paradox is solved by the realization that electric and magnetic fields in combination can carry momentum. When one adds that momentum in, momentum is conserved without equal and opposite forces.
 
///Are the forces ALWAYS exactly opposite of each other?\\\

that's seems right if the forces was acts in diffrents bodies as if we have a horse hold a care ! so mybe the force acts on each body is diffrent ! isn't it :)
 
My question is this: are Newton's three laws of motion as general ideas about motion correct?

1. The first law is the principle of inertia. It states that an object in motion will conntinue to move unless acted on by an external force. And that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an external force.

2. The second law states that the change in momentum is proportional to the external force.

3. The third law is that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
 
for which case u ask?

u ask as general if those r right or not? this is not a specified question ! sir ,
 
Been around 40 years since I took basic physics in college and while I remember doing some examples of insulation values / energy conduction, I doubt I could to the math now even if I could find the formulas. I have some some corrugated plastic sheet (think of the plastic signs you see on the side of the road) that is used in bee hives. Also have some used in a green house though a bit different in dimensions than this example but the general approach should still apply. Typically, both...
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Back
Top