- #1
- 24,017
- 3,338
Ok, I can't stand Russell Crowe. He's around 60, isn't he? He sure looks it. Who the heck cast him as Robin Hood? Blegh.
Ok a poll.
Ok a poll.
Evo said:Ewwwww.
[PLAIN]http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/2108/robinhoodcrowegak.jpg[/QUOTE] He doesn't look like Robin Hood, or a member of the Merry Men.
I grew up with The Adventures of Robin Hood (1955–1960), a British (BBC) series staring Richard Greene. Alex Gauge played a delightful Friar Tuck.
It was a favorite show, as was Ivanhoe.
Edit: List of actors who played Robin Hood over the decades:
http://robinhoodtree.blogspot.com/2006/08/robin-hood-1991-film-review.html
I can't see Uma Thurman as Maid Marian. I think I saw the movie, and it was a bit hokey.
I like Crowe's acting, particularly in Gladiator and A Beautiful Mind.
Robin Hood never left England in the original stories. Him going on Crusade is a new thing.turbo-1 said:If Robin Hood was indeed a skilled archer and a leader of men, it is not unreasonable to consider that he might have been a middle-aged man upon his return to England.
Might not have been crusade. England always seemed to be contesting parts of mainland Europe with France.Evo said:Robin Hood never left England in the original stories. Him going on Crusade is a new thing.
The King he supposedly served, Richard the Lionhearted, was French and didn't even speak English. No original stories I'm aware of ever put Robin Hood outside of England.turbo-1 said:Might not have been crusade. England always seemed to be contesting parts of mainland Europe with France.
Evo said:Kevin Costner was the worst Robin Hood...EVER. Sometimes he'd have an English accent, sometimes he'd forget. He could barely get his lines out in any accent.
I know! The was no inflection, it's unbelievable that a person could do an entire movie that way!lisab said:He delivered most of his lines, whether accented or not, in a monotone!
There is nothing 'realistic" about it. I'm watching a documentary on the making of this movie and how much of the recent additions and modern updates in opposition to the original stories this one has. Robin Hood is a story that has grown and changed immensely over hundreds of years.zomgwtf said:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0955308/usercomments
These people who have seen the movie also seem to agree... So why should we compare Russell Crowe to all the other Robin Hoods. I'm actually glad that they are taking a more realistic route to this movie. I didn't really like the 'merry-men' robin hoods... mostly just thought they were funny. Not very entertaining though.
I love how you set the poll up though Evo. .
BobG said:I thought Crowe was great in Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World.
Evo said:The poll is about Crowe playing Robin Hood, not about the movie.
Robin Hood should be a hottie.
Adrian Paul perhaps, but he may be a bit too old now. He'll be 51 soon.Evo said:Robin Hood should be a hottie.
I don't plan to see the movie, Crowe would ruin my image of Robin Hood. It would be like Roseanne Barr cast as Maid Marian.zomgwtf said:It is entirely about the movie if it's about Crowe playing Robin Hood. Russell Crowe I believe has proven himself with his performance in Gladiator of being able to portray, successfully a soldier from an ancient time. Just the scruffy way he looks and talks and his acting is spot on.
If you think that back in the 12th century that a 'true robin hood' character would be considered a hottie then maybe you just shouldn't see the movie.
He looks a hell of a lot hotter than Crowe.Astronuc said:Adrian Paul perhaps, but he may be a bit too old now. He'll be 51 soon.
Evo said:I don't plan to see the movie, Crowe would ruin my image of Robin Hood. It would be like Roseanne Barr cast as Maid Marian.
The question I would have is "Was there ever a real Robin Hood, and what do we know about him?" Any movie should not veer outside the known facts.Evo said:There is nothing 'realistic" about it. I'm watching a documentary on the making of this movie and how much of the recent additions and modern updates in opposition to the original stories this one has. Robin Hood is a story that has grown and changed immensely over hundreds of years.
The poll is about Crowe playing Robin Hood, not about the movie.
Robin Hood should be a hottie.
zoobyshoe said:The question I would have is "Was there ever a real Robin Hood, and what do we know about him?" Any movie should not veer outside the known facts.
No, the story has been changing since the 14th century, which was when the first written references were made, dating him to the 11th century. Before that they can only trace the stories to oral ballads. If there was a real "Robin Hood" we don't know anything about him, like "King Arthur" and Camelot.zoobyshoe said:The question I would have is "Was there ever a real Robin Hood, and what do we know about him?" Any movie should not veer outside the known facts.
Evo said:No, the story has been changing since the 14th century. If there was a real "Robin Hood" we don't know anything about him, like "King Arthur" and Camelot.
Yeah, I think they are using more history than previous movies. Except Maid Marion, they pointed out, is being treated in the fashion of 19th & 20th century writings about her. When she first appeared in the 16th century, she was fat and bawdy and the lover of Friar Tuck.zomgwtf said:Just in my defense I stated that it's realistic to the time... No one ever stated realistic to the real story of Robin Hood. lol. There certainly can be a realistic 12th century movie based on evidence we have and I believe this Robin Hood is going for more of that sort of 'gritty' feel that would go along with it.
zoobyshoe said:Personally I would want a film that sticks to the earliest known version.
I don't like the phenomenon of stories that get embellished over time. Take vampires. A vampire movie should stick to the original folk tale of the strigoi, or, if you're talking Dracula, should be a biography of Vlad Dracul. Instead, the current trend is to make the hottest vampire.
Frame Dragger said:I like your style zooby! Maybe toss in a Kappa or two for good measure, the Japanese really know how to scare the living crap out of a person. Hellsing isn't bad either... anything based on that bawdy psychotic Vlad Ţepeş (Dracul/Impaler). I particularly enjoyed his notion of an inauguration. :evil:
zoobyshoe said:Personally I would want a film that sticks to the earliest known version.
I don't like the phenomenon of stories that get embellished over time. Take vampires. A vampire movie should stick to the original folk tale of the strigoi, or, if you're talking Dracula, should be a biography of Vlad Dracul. Instead, the current trend is to make the hottest vampire.
zoobyshoe said:I had to look up "kappa":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kappa_(folklore)
I suppose a good Japanese film maker could make a better strigoi movie than a Western director. When I saw Throne of Blood I felt it was somehow more faithful to Shakespeare than any western film of MacBeth I ever saw, despite the paradox that Shakespeare without the language can't be Shakespeare.
Shakespeare should probably have written Robin Hood. Then there's be a definitive version. I wonder if he ever considered it.
SticksandStones said:I can't imagine anything more boring!
Might have been too dangerous a subject: take from the rich, give to the poor. All Bill's patrons were wealthy.Frame Dragger said:Mmmm, that would be nice. Given that he touched on everything from history to faeries, I'm sure it must have crossed his mind. Perhaps it wasn't popular at the time?
Frame Dragger said:I like your style zooby! Maybe toss in a Kappa or two for good measure, the Japanese really know how to scare the living crap out of a person. Hellsing isn't bad either... anything based on that bawdy psychotic Vlad Ţepeş (Dracul/Impaler). I particularly enjoyed his notion of an inauguration. :evil: