- #71
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 24,775
- 792
Evo said:Robin Hood never left England in the original stories. Him going on Crusade is a new thing.
I've always liked your views on lit and cultural history, and enjoyed the way you convey them, but I disagree in this case.
Or expect I will disagree when I get around to seeing the movie.
I think this is a PREQUEL which develops the Robinic legend in a way that can help ordinary Americans realize their humanity more better.
Americans like action movies and epic battles between good and evil like Lord of Rings battle and a lesson can be taught by this means.
Right now we are being oppressed and and exploited by inhuman power-machine finance and insurance corporations and most of us don't even resent it. We blame our government which is the only collective way of making rules that these greed machines have to obey. And the corporate money corrupts and diminishes our democracy. OK. Ridley Scott says
SUPPOSE THE SUPERRICH AND THE CORPORATIONS ARE THE NORMANS. Let's take the simpler example where we have these Normans running the country and creating huge inequalities. How does it get equalized.
And Russell Crowe is an ORDINARY SOLDIER---a Crusades vet. Of the average age of US adult male population. Like our First Gulf vets.
and he doesn't start out with a vision of a career in politics, or anything. He's just this ordinary middleage war vet trying to get along.
BUT HE GETS FORCED BY THE obvious Norman injustice INTO THIS ROLE.
And he doesn't just start his Forest Business of redistributing income, he actually BRINGS ABOUT THE SIGNING OF THE MAGNA CARTA (i.e. "justice under law" not mere justice, but under law).
So Ridley Scott has made a creative use of the Robin legend in order to show how an ordinary slightly overweight middleage war vet can actually do something worthwhile and gradually get woken up to some wellfocused activism.
I like Ridley Scott. I always liked that movie where Rutger Hauer the artificial human confronts his Maker for having given him too short a lifetime. It seems like a reasonable gripe. Ridley Scott has the ability to deal with basic issues without you necessarily noticing, because it is clothed in a popular genre.
I may be disappointed. I haven't seen the Scott/Crowe Robin yet.
Last edited: