Is the Classical Electric Potential a Valid Approximation in Quantum Mechanics?

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
When we setup the Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom we use the classical electric potential. It seems that we would need a new potential instead of mixing QM and classical.
Is this just a very good approximation or is there something subtle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
When we setup the Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom we use the classical electric potential. It seems that we would need a new potential instead of mixing QM and classical.
Is this just a very good approximation or is there something subtle.

It's a very good approximation. For one, relativistic corrections exist (but that's not what you're asking) that come about with the Dirac Equation. As for your question, in what is termed "Second Quantization", the electromagnetic potential can also be quantized. This is the field of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). It provides the most accurate framework for including the electromagnetic potentials.
 
thanks for your answer. if its not to much trouble how do they correct for relativity in the potential.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top