MHB Is the definite integral ∫ [arcsin(1/x)-1/x]of indeterminate form?

AI Thread Summary
The definite integral ∫[arcsin(1/x) - 1/x] dx from 1 to infinity is analyzed for its convergence and whether it is of indeterminate form. The integrand approaches zero as x approaches infinity, suggesting potential convergence. However, a detailed evaluation is needed to determine if the integral converges or diverges. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proving the behavior of the integrand at the limits of integration. Ultimately, the conclusion regarding the integral's form hinges on rigorous mathematical proof.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Is the definite integral

$$\int_{1}^{\infty}\left(\arcsin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{1}{x} \right)\,dx$$

of indeterminate form or not? Prove your statement.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Is the definite integral

$$\int_{1}^{\infty}\left(\arcsin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{1}{x} \right)\,dx$$

of indeterminate form or not? Prove your statement.

For $x > 1$ we have the indefinite form:
\begin{aligned}\int\left(\arcsin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{1}{x} \right)\,dx
&= x \arcsin(1/x) - \int x\,d(\arcsin(1/x)) - \int \frac 1x\, dx \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) - \int x\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(1/x)^2}}\cdot -\frac 1{x^2}\,dx - \int \frac 1x\, dx \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) + \int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^2-1}} - \ln x \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) + \ln\left({\sqrt{x^2-1}} + x\right) - \ln x + C \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) + \ln\left({\sqrt{1-1/x^2}} + 1\right) + C
\end{aligned}
Thus the improper definite integral is:
\begin{aligned}\int_1^\infty\left(\arcsin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{1}{x} \right)\,dx
&= \left[ x \arcsin(1/x) + \ln\left({\sqrt{1-1/x^2}} + 1\right) \right]_1^\infty\\
&= \lim_{a\to\infty} a \arcsin(1/a) + \ln 2 - \arcsin 1 \\
&= \lim_{a\to\infty}\left[ \frac{\arcsin(1/a)}{1/a} \right] + \ln 2 - \frac\pi 2 \\
&= \lim_{a\to\infty}\left[ \frac{\frac 1{\sqrt{1-1/a^2}}\cdot -\frac 1{a^2}}{-\frac1{a^2}} \right] + \ln 2 - \frac\pi 2 \\
&= 1 + \ln 2 - \frac\pi 2
\end{aligned}

Therefore the given improper definite integral is determinate.
 
I like Serena said:
For $x > 1$ we have:
\begin{aligned}\int\left(\arcsin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{1}{x} \right)\,dx
&= x \arcsin(1/x) - \int x\,d(\arcsin(1/x)) - \int \frac 1x\, dx \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) - \int x\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(1/x)^2}}\cdot -\frac 1{x^2}\,dx - \int \frac 1x\, dx \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) + \int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^2-1}} - \ln x \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) + \ln\left({\sqrt{x^2-1}} + x\right) - \ln x \\
&= x \arcsin(1/x) + \ln\left({\sqrt{1-1/x^2}} + 1\right)
\end{aligned}
Thus:
\begin{aligned}\int_1^\infty\left(\arcsin \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{1}{x} \right)\,dx
&= \left[ x \arcsin(1/x) + \ln\left({\sqrt{1-1/x^2}} + 1\right) \right]_1^\infty\\
&= \lim_{a\to\infty} a \arcsin(1/a) + \ln 2 - \arcsin 1 \\
&= \lim_{a\to\infty}\left[ \frac{\arcsin(1/a)}{1/a} \right] + \ln 2 - \frac\pi 2 \\
&= \lim_{a\to\infty}\left[ \frac{\frac 1{\sqrt{1-1/a^2}}\cdot -\frac 1{a^2}}{-\frac1{a^2}} \right] + \ln 2 - \frac\pi 2 \\
&= 1 + \ln 2 - \frac\pi 2
\end{aligned}

Great job, I like Serena! (Nod) Thankyou for your participation!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top