Is the Hard Sphere Collision Cross Section for 3-Body Systems Always Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brad sue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Collision
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I was reading an article and I have this affirmation i don't know if correct:
the hard sphere collision cross section for 3 bodies always equal to zero. Is it true?

Why should it be?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to provide a reference or at least a definition for "hard sphere".

In the classical sense, it is surely unlikely that three bodies make contact simultaneously. But are you talking of a classical or a quantum system?
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
You might want to provide a reference or at least a definition for "hard sphere".

In the classical sense, it is surely unlikely that three bodies make contact simultaneously. But are you talking of a classical or a quantum system?

Hard sphere is the "normal" cross section we have in classical physics namely pi*radius^2.
we are in quantum system and usually thr cross section is function of the particle speeds.

I am trying to understand this 3 body cross section with the quantum energy bound states but all those curves drive me crazy! maybe it is not the good way to approach it...
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top