Is the Heat Equation Model for an Insulated Rod Correct?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the heat equation model for an insulated rod, specifically addressing the correct interpretation of boundary conditions and heat supply terms. The equation derived is correct, but clarification is needed on the distinction between total heat (S) and heat per length (s). The derivative at the boundary must specify the location, particularly at x=L, to be meaningful. The application of Fourier's law confirms the relationship between total heat flow and the heat per length. Overall, the participants agree that the calculations and interpretations align with the principles of heat conduction.
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/7641/20240456gw8.png

Homework Equations


http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/5879/63445047rj2.png

Note that the rightside of the rod is insulated.

The Attempt at a Solution


I get this model:

\frac{ \partial{u} }{ \partial{t} } = \kappa \frac{ \partial{ ^2 u} }{ \partial{x^2} } +s

u(0,t)=u_0
\frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} } = 0In steady state this gives: u(x) = \frac{- s}{ \kappa} \frac{1}{2}x^2 + \frac{s}{ \kappa } L x + u_0

But if I calcute than the asked u' at x=0:

I get:

\frac{du}{dx} = \frac{s}{ \kappa} L

Is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What I don't understand is what do they mean by "total heat supply"? I presume they mean s (=source). But I get a different answer out of my equation.
 
Your answer looks fine. Note, though, that the equation

<br /> \frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} } = 0<br />

means nothing on its own; we need to specify a location:

<br /> \left(\frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} }\right)_{x=L} = 0<br />

For the heat supply question: we need to distinguish the total heat S from the heat per length s=S/L that goes into the differential equation. By applying Fourier's conduction law, your answer indicates a total heat flow of sL=S, which is correct. The units will always confirm whether S or s is being used appropriately.
 
Mapes said:
Your answer looks fine. Note, though, that the equation

<br /> \frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} } = 0<br />

means nothing on its own; we need to specify a location:

<br /> \left(\frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} }\right)_{x=L} = 0<br />
You're right but I couldn't get this in latex. Note that the notation you are using isn't the right one either there should be a large bar at the right hand side something like this: |_{x=L}

For the heat supply question: we need to distinguish the total heat S from the heat per length s=S/L that goes into the differential equation. By applying Fourier's conduction law, your answer indicates a total heat flow of sL=S, which is correct. The units will always confirm whether S or s is being used appropriately.
Of ocurse, how could I overlooked that!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K