Is the internal energy of a gas a combination of kinetic and potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
The internal energy of a gas consists of both kinetic and potential energy components, as the particles possess both types of energy. In the case of phase changes, such as from liquid to gas, latent heat contributes to increasing the potential energy of the particles. However, for an ideal gas, it is assumed that there are no interactions between molecules, meaning the internal energy is solely kinetic energy. This distinction is crucial for understanding the behavior of gases under different conditions. Overall, the internal energy of a gas can vary based on its state and the interactions of its particles.
nokia8650
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Internal energy of a gas

Is the internal energy of a gas simply the total kinetic energy possesed by the particles? I ask this, since I have read this to be the case, however I have also read that when changing state, eg. from liquid to gas, the latent heat is the energy required to increase the potential enrgy of the particles, as well as do work against external pressure. If energy is put into increase the potential energy, surely some of the internal energy of the gas is potential energy, as well as kinetic energy, isn't it?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nokia8650 said:
surely some of the internal energy of the gas is potential energy, as well as kinetic energy, isn't it?
You are indeed correct. The internal energy of a gas can be thought of as the sum of the kinetic and potential energies of the constituent molecules. However, note that for the special case of an ideal gas, it is assumed that the molecules do not interact, i.e. there is no potential energy. Hence, for an ideal gas the internal energy is the kinetic energy of the molecules, since there is no potential component.

Further reading: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/inteng.html"

I hope that makes sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you ever so much, it makes a lot more sense now!
 
nokia8650 said:
Thank you ever so much, it makes a lot more sense now!
A pleasure :smile:

Don't forget to mark this thread a 'solved' when your done, thanks.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top