Undergrad Is the Oort Cloud Just Speculation or a Real Cosmic Structure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rootone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloud Oort cloud
Click For Summary
The Oort Cloud is theorized as a spherical reservoir of long-period comets at the outer edge of the Solar System, initially proposed by Ernst Öpik and later expanded by Jan Oort. While the existence of the Oort Cloud is supported by the trajectories of comets, some question whether it is merely speculation, as no direct evidence has been observed unlike the inner asteroid and Kuiper belts. There is a discussion on the nature of long-period comets, with some suggesting they could originate from interstellar material rather than the Oort Cloud. The distinction between bound and unbound comets is also highlighted, as most long-period comets appear to have eccentricities less than or equal to one. The debate continues on the Oort Cloud's existence and its relationship to the Solar System.
rootone
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
946
I know this has been suggested because of long period comets.
Sort of a spherical asteroid belt at the very edge of where the Sun's gravity has any relevance.
The inner asteroid belt, and the Kuiper belt though have many examples of objects which are proof that they exist.
Is the Oort cloud any more just fairly reasonable speculation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The main evidence for the existence of the Oort cloud s the trajectories of comets.

from wikipedia
In 1932, the Estonian astronomer Ernst Öpik postulated that long-period comets originated in an orbiting cloud at the outermost edge of the Solar System.[7] The idea was independently revived by Dutch astronomer Jan Oort as a means to resolve a paradox.[8] Over the course of the Solar System's existence the orbits of comets are unstable and eventually dynamics dictate that a comet must either collide with the Sun or a planet or else be ejected from the Solar System by planetary perturbations. Moreover, their volatile composition means that as they repeatedly approach the Sun, radiation gradually boils the volatiles off until the comet splits or develops an insulating crust that prevents further outgassing. Thus, Oort reasoned, a comet could not have formed while in its current orbit and must have been held in an outer reservoir for almost all of its existence.[8][9][10]

There are two main classes of comet, short-period comets (also called ecliptic comets) and long-period comets (also called nearly isotropic comets). Ecliptic comets have relatively small orbits, below 10 AU, and follow the ecliptic plane, the same plane in which the planets lie. All long-period comets have very large orbits, on the order of thousands of AU, and appear from every direction in the sky.[10] Oort noted that there was a peak in numbers of long-period comets with aphelia (their farthest distance from the Sun) of roughly 20,000 AU, which suggested a reservoir at that distance with a spherical, isotropic distribution.[10] Those relatively rare comets with orbits of about 10,000 AU have probably gone through one or more orbits through the Solar System and have had their orbits drawn inward by the gravity of the planets.[10]
 
What I find disturbing is the fact, that we think the Oort Cloud exists and is still related to our sun, but this doesn't prevent us from calling the Voyagers' current positions interstellar at about 111 AU, 135 AU resp. It will take them another 6,000 years to reach it (20,000 AU assumed).
 
  • Like
Likes Hoophy
I can see where the reasoning comes from.
However is it not possible that very long period comets are just small bits of interstellar material that never were part of the solar system, or any other system, just loosely bound frozen gases (including water)
(Not a personal theory, just a question)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Hoophy
fresh_42 said:
What I find disturbing is the fact, that we think the Oort Cloud exists and is still related to our sun, but this doesn't prevent us from calling the Voyagers' current positions interstellar at about 111 AU, 135 AU resp. It will take them another 6,000 years to reach it (20,000 AU assumed).
It's called interstellar space because that's where the interstellar winds are dominate. The sun becomes as insignificant as every other star. The Oort cloud is only bound to the sun because it's the closest strong source of gravity, other than that, it's essentially an interstellar object, the sun has no effect on it.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
rootone said:
I can see where the reasoning comes from.
However is it not possible that very long period comets are just small bits of interstellar material that never were part of the solar system, or any other system, just loosely bound frozen gases (including water)
(Not a personal theory, just a question)

If comets were falling in from interstellar space, you would expect most of them to have eccentricities greater than 1, indicating that they are not bound to the solar system. In practice I think (not sure) that most long period comet eccentricities are less than 1, or at most equal to 1 within experimental uncertainty.
 
Thanks everyone.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K