Is the QM phase of a particle a coincidence in relativistic quantum mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Qm
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
The QM phase of a single particle traveling freely in 3 dimensions is (rp – Et), where r and p are the 3-D position and momentum vectors. This is also the dot product of the space-time four-vector (r,-t) with the Energy-Momentum four-vector (p,E)

Is this "coincidence" related to relativistic QM?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. It is not a coincidence. It is the case in any relativistic wave, including classical EM.
 
clem said:
No. It is not a coincidence. It is the case in any relativistic wave, including classical EM.
What classical EM equation(s) contain this term? I looked at the original version of Maxwell's Equations and could not see any connection. Thanks.
 
A classical EM wave is {\bf E}\exp[i({\bf k\cdot r}-\omega t)].
 
It is a consequence of the fact that relativistic fields satisfies the relativistic wave equation which in the non-relativistic limit gives the Schrodinger eq, and of the de Broglie relation: E = \hbar \omega, p = \hbar k. As a consequence the phase of a field is Lorentz invariant and the four-vector (\omega, k) is covariant.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top