Studying Is the suggestion for self-learning mathematics from books wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter user079622
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Self-learning mathematics from books can be challenging, particularly for individuals without prior knowledge or experience in subjects like calculus. The discussion highlights that when learners encounter difficulties, they lack immediate support, as books cannot provide interactive assistance. This raises the question of the necessity of teachers, who offer personalized explanations and guidance. While self-teaching is feasible, formal instruction is often more effective for establishing a strong foundation in STEM subjects. It provides structured feedback, helps identify knowledge gaps, and offers credentials that are recognized by others, enhancing the overall learning experience.
user079622
Messages
449
Reaction score
29
Why some people suggest self learn math from books, is the suggestion for self-learning mathematics from books wrong?
For example, I think that men how never get in contact with calculus(plus have gaps in prior knowledge), will have really hard time to self learn topic with only books. When you stuck in one part in book, who will ask for help? Book can't talk

If we can just self learn from books, why we have teachers?
I think teacher or any person who will explain the material to you(in person or video lecture) is better option than self learn from book.

What do you think about it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have the right idea.

While self-teaching is certainly possible, to really establish a solid foundation in just about any STEM topic, it tends to be far more efficient to go through formal instruction from experts. As a learner this gives you formal, standardized, external feedback on your knowledge base and your skill set. It helps you to identify gaps in understanding. It gives you the opportunity to seek assistance when you encounter problems. And when you're done, you have a credential that others will recognize.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
884
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Back
Top