Is the Work-Energy Principle Valid Without Friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the validity of various statements related to the work-energy principle in the context of frictionless scenarios. The correct answers to the true or false statements are identified as FTFFTF. Key points include that the work done to raise an object does not depend on the time taken, and kinetic energy is independent of motion direction and cannot be negative. Additionally, the work-energy principle remains valid in the absence of friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts for accurate problem-solving in physics.
evan b
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement





Select T-True, F-False, for each statement. If the first is T and the rest F, enter TFFFFF.

A) The work done to raise a box onto a platform depends on how much time it takes to raise it. (Neglect friction, assume it starts on the ground at rest, and ends up resting on the platform)
B) The work done by a constant force acting on an object depends on the orientation of the force relative to the motion of the object
C) Work can be done in the absence of motion.
D) The kinetic energy of an object depends on the direction of the motion involved.
E) The kinetic energy can never be negative.
F) The work-energy principle is not valid if there are frictional forces acting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evan b said:

Homework Statement



Select T-True, F-False, for each statement. If the first is T and the rest F, enter TFFFFF.

A) The work done to raise a box onto a platform depends on how much time it takes to raise it. (Neglect friction, assume it starts on the ground at rest, and ends up resting on the platform)
B) The work done by a constant force acting on an object depends on the orientation of the force relative to the motion of the object
C) Work can be done in the absence of motion.
D) The kinetic energy of an object depends on the direction of the motion involved.
E) The kinetic energy can never be negative.
F) The work-energy principle is not valid if there are frictional forces acting.

One thing that is definitely true here is that you have to show some effort if you want some help.

So with that in mind, what are your thoughts on the statements?
 
i finaly figured it out. it was FTFFTF.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top