Is there a fractional frequency of light?

In summary: Exactly. My concern was that distinction may well not be so obvious within a class B thread. Thus I pointed it out.
  • #1
Mustafa Bayram
7
0
If emw spectrum is continuous, possible wavelengths should be infinite and there should be fraction of frequencies like 25,2 hertz. Well is there a fractional frequency of light?
In high school when we are teaching interference of light we say "only the same wavelength of lights interfere with each other because of that we are using a monochromatic light source". If the spectrum is infinite, the only way to have monochromatic light and see the interference pattern becomes lasers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are fractional frequencies - any frequency is allowed.
Even with a laser, I could move the laser device towards you or away from you and the Doppler effect would finely adjust the frequency and wavelength.

As a matter of practicality, lasers are the way to produce interference patterns with light.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and Mustafa Bayram
  • #3
Mustafa Bayram said:
If emw spectrum is continuous, possible wavelengths should be infinite and there should be fraction of frequencies like 25,2 hertz. Well is there a fractional frequency of light?
In high school when we are teaching interference of light we say "only the same wavelength of lights interfere with each other because of that we are using a monochromatic light source". If the spectrum is infinite, the only way to have monochromatic light and see the interference pattern becomes lasers.
There is no such thing as a perfectly monochromatic source: all sources send out light over a certain bandwith; this also includers lasers. That is, the spectrum of light contains "peaks" rather than "lines".,
 
  • Like
Likes Mustafa Bayram and vanhees71
  • #4
Mustafa Bayram said:
there should be fraction of frequencies like 25,2 hertz
Sure. 25.2 hertz is 25200 kHz, or 25200000 megahertz…. and those numbers would look completely different if we reported the frequency in cycles per fortnight instead of cycles per second.

Exact non-fractional values and remarkable numerical correlations between otherwise unrelated quantities are most often artifacts of our choice of units, with no physical significance.
 
  • Like
Likes Mustafa Bayram, Vanadium 50 and phinds
  • #5
Nugatory said:
25.2 hertz is 25200 kHz, or 25200000 megahertz ...
Misplaced decimal points?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #6
Hyperfine said:
Misplaced decimal points?
No, an example of how choice of units definitions affects numerical values.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #7
Nugatory said:
correlations between otherwise unrelated quantities are most often artifacts of our choice of units, with no physical significance.
what he said (very small).jpg
 
  • #8
phinds said:
No, an example of how choice of units definitions affects numerical values.
Then remove the word "is". As stated it equates 25.2 Hz with 25200 KHz. That is not a choice of units, it is simply an error.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Mark44
  • #9
Hyperfine said:
Then remove the word "is". As stated it equates 25.2 Hz with 25200 KHz. That is not a choice of units, it is simply an error.
Of course it's an error - responding quickly while on the road. The general point about units is valid, the numbers are wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and berkeman
  • #10
Nugatory said:
Of course it's an error - responding quickly while on the road. The general point about units is valid, the numbers are wrong.
Exactly. My concern was that distinction may well not be so obvious within a class B thread. Thus I pointed it out.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and vanhees71

Similar threads

Back
Top