Is there a more elegant way to express eg 14% (Base_10) in Octal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nik_2213
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on expressing the decimal value of 14% in octal notation, exploring whether there is a more elegant representation than 11/100 in base 8. The conversation suggests that octal representation might approximate 14% as about 1/12th, which translates to 0.112 in octal for accuracy. The conversion process is examined, revealing that 14 in decimal equals 16 in octal, leading to various fraction representations like 7/62 in octal. The challenges of performing arithmetic in octal are noted, particularly in division, where confusion arises from the lack of familiarity with octal multiplication tables. Additionally, there is a tangential mention of the complexity of legacy measurement systems in the UK and the difficulty in finding convenient terms for octal equivalents, with a suggestion of using "Nine Gadols" for 14% in base 8.
Nik_2213
Messages
1,218
Reaction score
493
Is there a more elegant way to express eg 14% (Base_10) in Octal than as eg 11/100 {Base_8} ?

Tangential: Has any-one seen a Base_8 slide-rule, be-it linear or circular ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nik_2213 said:
Is there a more elegant way to express eg 14% (Base_10) in Octal than as eg 11/100 {Base_8} ?

Tangential: Has any-one seen a Base_8 slide-rule, be-it linear or circular ??
Surely, like us, an octal-based critter would round it to the nearest easy fraction - which for them would be "about 1/12th". (Because (Base_8) 1/12th is (Base_10) 1/10th).

But if it had to go for accuracy, they'd dispense with the fractions (as do we) and say "exactly 0.112".

(Did I get those numbers right? I really struggled in base notation in grade school.)
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
(Did I get those numbers right? I really struggled in base notation in grade school.)
Well, $$\frac{14_{10}}{100_{10}} = \frac{16_8}{144_8} = \frac{7_8}{62_8}$$ which I'm positive about.

Then I watched a YT vid on dividing in octal and got confused. So, try it the hard way...

<octal>
7/62 = 0%7
70/62=1%6
60/62=0%60
600/62=probably 6 or 7, no clue of the carry.
</octal>

so, I get as far as ##0.107_8## before my failure to memorize the ##10_8 \times## table kicks in. Ah, the follies of youth...
 
Last edited:
Tangential: Bane of DIY in UK is the zoo of legacy systems. BSP garden taps, any-one ? I grew up with 'Imperial' mensuration, segued to 'scientific. Then I ran into US imports such as HPLC systems that took eg #10-24 and #10-32 UNC/UNF, the latter finger-tight to 200 Bar !!

Extending the above posters' suggestions, I reckoned that, like eg 11_Base10 and 100_Base10 there'd be convenient words for their equivalents_Base8.

I came up with 14% _Base10 == Nine Gadols_Base8 ( To 2½ DP ?) [[ Insert local glyphs for 64Gadolinium ]]

I'm sorry, given Sumerians etc used Base60, my Google-fu failed me on any better way to express 64_Base10...
 
I was inspired by Jane Hawk trilogy of Dean Koontz. The villains injected people with brain control nanobots, and the possessed humans could form a hive mind. The villain try to do something similar in my story, that is supposed to be rather scientifically realistic, not space fantasy. On the other hand, she cant inject all the people in a town, the nano have to get in by drinkwater, so only a tiny amount for each victim. Is it a bottleneck, how the possessed people will be able to receive...
Earth has one large natural satellite in reality. This is only talking about the context of a habitable, planet that has the conditions as Earth, with similar axial tilt. It would have a moon system similar to that of Uranus. Let's say it has 6 moons, similar in size to Puck, Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. These 6 moons would orbit in safe, stable orbits around the Earth-like planet. What would their apparent size, and realistic distance be from the Earth-like planet? What...
Back
Top