Is There a Non-Calculus Method to Prove this Thermodynamic Inequality?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality \( \frac{y^x-1}{xy^{x-1}(y-1)}<1 \) for \( x, y \in \mathbb{R} \) with \( x>1 \) and \( y>1 \) without using calculus. Participants suggest manipulating the expression by subtracting 1 and finding a common denominator to analyze the signs of the numerator and denominator. The challenge lies in demonstrating that the numerator \( y^x - 1 - xy^x + xy^{x-1} < 0 \) is negative. Suggestions include experimenting with specific values of \( x \) and \( y \) and graphing the left-hand side and right-hand side to visualize their relationship. Overall, the conversation emphasizes exploring alternative mathematical approaches to validate the inequality.
emroz92
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Prove that
$$ \frac{y^x-1}{xy^{x-1}(y-1)}<1$$
where x,y \in ℝ, x&gt;1 and y&gt;1.

I was able to prove it using calculus, but am wondering if there was another way of doing so, like exploiting some inequality-theorems which involves real numbers. I'll be glad if anyone can show me a way and quench my hunch.

Cheers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$ \frac{y^x-1}{xy^{x-1}(y-1)}<1$$
where x,y \in ℝ, x&gt;1 and y&gt;1.

hmmm, not a fancy theorem but ... did you try - subtract 1 from both sides and put the LHS over a common denominator:

which means that either the numerator or the denominator is negative.

notice that the denominator is a product of only positive numbers?
see where this is going?
 
Thanks. But I am afraid I still can't see how the numerator is negative; that is:
$$y^x-1-xy^x+xy^{x-1}<0$$.
I was stuck with this expression before you pointed out. I think this part is the difficult one.
 
It is sometimes easier to see when something is negative ... you may have to experiment a bit to find a pattern... i.e. if x=1, what values of y will make the relation = 0, what values >0 and what values <0?

Alternatively:
$$\Rightarrow y^x-1 < xy^{x-1}(y-1)$$
... what conditions have to be satisfied for that to be true?
You should be able to see how it will be true just by graphing the LHS and the RHS.
Try figuring what y and x could be - like what happens is x>1 and 0<y<1 ?

geometrically, the LHS and RHS describe surfaces in 3D - LHS=RHS will be the intersection of these two surfaces.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top