MHB Is there a relationship between pi, physics, and probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aetzbar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between pi, physics, and probability, emphasizing the connection between mathematics, geometry, and physical constants. A formula is presented, suggesting that the value of pi can vary based on specific variables related to circle diameter and a constant. The conversation raises questions about the implications of this variability and its relevance to probability and statistics. Concerns are expressed regarding the clarity and coherence of the assertions made. The thread seeks a more lucid explanation of these concepts to facilitate further discussion.
aetzbar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The natural connection between physics,math,and geometry

A – variable from 0.001mm to infinity mm ( A = diameter of circle )

B – variable from 0.0173 to zero

C – constant number 0.0000003
The nature formula is ABB = C

B of A = root of ( C : A ) Variable pi formula

Pi of A = 3.1416 + root of ( C : A )

Report
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The only thing I could distill from your post is that you are asserting the value of $\pi$ somehow varies...in what kind of space are you operating? What does this have to do with probability/statistics?

My first inclination was to simply shut down your thread as it was on another site, but I want to give you a chance to post something lucid before doing so.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top