Is there a universal math database for precise definitions and theorems?

AI Thread Summary
A universal math database with precise definitions and theorems does not exist, as terminology can vary between authors. While the meanings of theorems and definitions are generally consistent, the wording can differ significantly. It is recommended to consult multiple sources to find the phrasing that resonates best with individual understanding. Despite variations, most printed versions convey the same underlying concepts. Ultimately, familiarity with different expressions can enhance comprehension in mathematics.
Noxide
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Does there exist a database with very specific mathematical definitions, theorems... etc? I've found that some thm's/dfn etc differ from author to author. Not necessarily in meaning, but in the words used to describe them. Is there a place where a precise definition can be found that is agreed upon by all mathematicians?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are no universally agreed ways to word specific theorems or definitions. However, discounting typos (and occasionally wikipedia!) you can be pretty certain that any two wordings of the same theorem/definition in print mean essentially the same thing. I suggest trying different sources until you find one that you are most comfortable with, and then referring to that.
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How deep does it need to go for a physics theory to be consistent?
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
B Cartesian Space vs. Euclidean Space
Replies
10
Views
2K
I could really use some help picking my optional module [GameDev]
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Shinichi Mochizuki's ABC Conjecture and Replication Crisis in Maths
Replies
33
Views
7K
Why can't there be a Database tool that has the best of everything?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Born rule as an axiom or as a theorem?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Is Mathematics a Belief System?
Replies
22
Views
4K
I Can the "measurement problem" just be an "epistemological ambiguity"?
Replies
15
Views
2K
Reactor Performance/Design As A Political Ideology
Replies
31
Views
3K
Rigorous Study of the Higgs Boson - Question
Replies
46
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top