Is this right about the double-slit experiment and quantum physics?

ace frehley
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is this right about the double-slit experiment and quantum physics??

Well I'm trying to understand the double-slit experiment (and quantum mechanics), so could you tell me if this is correct?

A photon is fired through two slits at a plate behind the slits. As long as it isn't observed it takes every possible path from the source (which emits the photons) to the plate. Because of that it interferes with itself creating a interference pattern. But if the photon is observed, the wave function collapses (?) and it is forced to only ''choose'' one path, so a single-slit pattern is formed.

Please tell me if this is correct and what is wrong and why. Any additional information is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That is correct. But a few things to keep in mind - first of all, thinking of the photon as taking multiple paths isn't necessarily correct. It's the wavefunction takes those paths. You can't think of it as being a particle at that time. Also, remember that 'observation' is really 'measurement'. It doesn't matter whether this is a conscious observer, or a hidden camera, or a particle detector. The fact is that you interfere with the wavefunction, and trigger a process known as decoherance.
 


Thanks, I'll keep that in mind :)
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top