Is Time Slowing Down? Scientists Weigh In

  • Thread starter Thread starter elbeasto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of time potentially slowing down and its implications for universal expansion. Participants express skepticism about the clarity and validity of the claims made in the referenced articles, particularly regarding the effects of time slowing down and the constancy of the speed of light. There is a debate about whether changes in the speed of light could coexist with a changing universal speed limit. Additionally, a paper is mentioned that suggests the universe's proper time is slowing down in relation to a higher-dimensional space, but its complexity raises concerns about its interpretation. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer explanations and further exploration of these theories.
elbeasto
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/01/scientist-says.html - Time slowing down
http://www.opfocus.org/index.php?topic=story&v=8&s=4 - Light slowing down

I read these articles some time ago. I was just wondering if anyone else has put any thought into this. Anyone have any reason why this cannot be true?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting stuff! I'm disappointed that no one has commented...c'mon, people...

To me, the slowing of time seems more sensible than dark energy.
 
In the first link, not enough information is given. What does it mean for time to "slow down" yet allow us to see the effects of it? In any case, we still have the issue that the universal expansion rate has changed and was not always speeding up.

Second link: see other discussions on this forum. You can't just change the speed of light. If you changed things to make the measured speed of light different, other things would change too. It certainly hasn't changed in the last 30 years!
 
Even if the speed of light slowed down "c" would still be 186,000miles/second, its just that we would have to separate the universal speed limit from the speed of light.
 
Interesting. I think I have some sort of idea.
 
JDługosz said:
In the first link, not enough information is given. What does it mean for time to "slow down" yet allow us to see the effects of it? In any case, we still have the issue that the universal expansion rate has changed and was not always speeding up.

Here's the original paper. I don't understand it, but it seems to be saying that the universe is embedded in hyperspace with coordinate ξ and the proper time of the universe T(ξ) is slowing down with ξ. It gives a proof that loss of time has to be smooth (in the sense of a smooth graph) so we would experience it as a slowing down of time rather than just having time stop. Slowing down of time is measurable as an acceleration of expansion.

If that's a correct reading, it's extremely sloppy to change coordinates without telling anyone. Then again they'd probably slap me for calling their theory hyperspace :-/

http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v77/i2/e027501
 
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...
Back
Top