Is UIC a good school for Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackraven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics School
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and its Physics program. Participants clarify that UIC is distinct from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), which is known for its prestigious Physics program. UIC is noted for its strong focus on condensed matter and high energy physics, benefiting from proximity to research facilities like Argonne National Laboratory and Fermilab. A current UIC student shares their positive experience, mentioning participation in summer research and highlighting the university's recent ranking as 11th among the world's best young universities by Times Higher Education. This ranking emphasizes UIC's research volume, influence, and innovation, positioning it as a promising institution in the academic landscape. Overall, UIC is presented as a solid choice for Physics, particularly for those interested in research opportunities.
blackraven
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking about transferring to UIC's Physics Program, but I would like to know if that is a good school for Physics. I mean University of Illinois at Chicago. By the way, I'm a she.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you mean UIUC? Champagne-Urbana?top-notch school. hard to get into. not going to be no cakewalk.
 
I suspect he means U of Illinois at Chicago, but he'd better clarify.
 
The only UIC that I know of is what jtbell mentioned - The University of Illinois at Chicago.

They have a very good condensed matter and high energy physics program. They benefit from being close to Argonne and Fermilab, and also the UW's synchrotron center. Juan Carlos Campuzano, who has a joint appointment with Argonne, has established a very respected photoemission group there.

Zz.
 
I'm actually attending UIC and doing summer research with one of the Physics professor's groups. I think it's a decent place for Physics relative to some places you could go.
 
Don't really know how relevant it is to the Physics program, or how prestigious it is but this is an email the Chancellor sent out on UIC's ranking in the world's best young universities published by Times Higher Education of the U.K.

"I am happy to inform you that the University of Illinois at Chicago is ranked 11th on a list of the world's best young universities published by Times Higher Education of the U.K.

This ranking is particularly gratifying because it is based on meaningful objective criteria.

The list, the first Times Higher Education "100 Under 50," uses the same 13 performance indicators as the Times Higher Education World University Rankings, but with a reduced weighting for subjective indicators of academic reputation. The objective performance factors include research volume, research influence, teaching and learning, international outlook, and industry innovation and income.

According to Phil Baty, editor of the rankings, "The innovative Times Higher Education 100 Under 50 is not about the old institutions that dominate the traditional rankings; it is about a new breed of global universities -- those that have managed to join the world's top table in just decades rather than centuries, and others showing great promise for the future. The new ranking gives us a glimpse of the future, hinting at who the future Harvard and Cambridge universities may be."

UIC was ranked third among U.S. institutions on the 100 Under 50 list, behind the University of California campuses at Irvine (4) and Santa Cruz (7). Nine U.S. institutions made the list of 100.

I hope you share in my pride for this latest recognition of the strength and vitality of our campus. In its relatively short lifetime, UIC has not only earned its place among the world's leading institutions of higher learning, but has established a rich history of service to the city and the state."

So that's a thing I suppose.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
85
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top