Is Unconscious Collective Prejudice Among White People a Reality?

  • Thread starter Wardw
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Color
In summary: But the facts are there, undeniable.So, assuming my theory is correct, (and it may not be).Why is it so, why do we white people seem have a colective prejudice?
  • #36
tribdog said:
I've noticed that people congregate together at lunch times in groups. the people who don't want me around go upstairs, the people who would prefer if I ate somewhere else go downstairs and the people who won't even look at me go to the main floor.

Personalityism is not the same thing as racism. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
klusener said:
Amusingly, I also remember a kid in my school who had lived in America for some years, (near Cupertino (sp?), California I think) and the Americans in his school used to make fun of him because he brought Indian food to school and they teased him for it. His parents were doctors and after a while he was so psychologically scarred that they quit their practice in America and moved back to India. Now that i think about it, I shouldn't have said amusingly, it was actually pretty sad..

As kids I don't think we realize how hurtful bullying can be. Its only when you look back as an adult that you realize. You don't often see this level of inhumanity routinely practiced in other contexts, but kids don't seem to see it as that bad (unless it happens to them), and adults don't bother that much because 'its only kids'. Maybe this is like the unconsious prejudice the OP is suggesting Whites have i.e. something that is seen but not noticed?
 
  • #38
singleton said:
... it and it will never change unless some day in thousands of years there are no longer "purebreds" of any race but humans are just "mutts"

I had a friend who was an enthusiastic advocate of the 'homogenous humanity' principle. In fact he seemed to be on a one-man mission to make it happen :rolleyes:
 
  • #39
singleton said:
Everyone feels most comfortable around those most like themselves

Sometimes 'opposites attract', but I think the general rule is 'birds of a feather flock together'. I've always thought this sort of rule well worth breaking, unless born a bird brain.
 
  • #40
Joel said:
Have a good one! I'll do a couple of Our Fathers then, just to be safe. (And read about enzymes used to digest vodka, while your out drinking it...) :biggrin:

I have such a hangover :frown: I said a few Father Flannagans, but it didn't seem to help. Damn those enzymes...
 
  • #41
Astronuc said:
White persons (European) or individuals of any other ethnic group are not inherently racist or ethnist. Rather, as others have indicated, such negative behavior is learned - transmitted from adults to children, from older generations to the next.

http://www.leaonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_3?cookieSet=1
"The consensus from the developmental literature examining children's intergroup attitudes has been that children as young as 3 years of age exhibit racial prejudice" but that this is probably ingroup favouritism rather than outgroup derogation.

Unless born blind, we have an inborn ability to discriminate between different colours, including skin colour. Its probably safe to say that we are more comfortable with the familiar than the unfamiliar. So if born in an all White (or Black etc) environment, those are the people we feel most comfortable with. The feelings we attach to people of a different skin colour will probably come from our upbringing, including affecting the feelings that spring from sheer unfamiliarity. The good news is that not everyone is brought up to be racist, and that as we get older (most of us) develop the cognitive skills necessary to be able to question the views we inherited from our parents.
 
  • #42
No, I don't even flinch about other races at all.
 
  • #43
The http://www.stirfryseminars.com/pages/coloroffear.htm video seems to imply exactly what the OP is saying. That Caucasian Americans (It does not extend the implication to Caucasians worldwide) are inherently racist. I was a bit disturbed by the message, as I have never considered myself as such. I still feel that racism is a learned response, the question is can it be unlearned?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #44
Integral said:
The http://www.stirfryseminars.com/pages/coloroffear.htm video seems to imply exactly what the OP is saying. That Caucasian Americans (It does not extend the implication to Caucasians worldwide) are inherently racist. I was a bit disturbed by the message, as I have never considered myself as such. I still feel that racism is a learned response...
The best evidence of this, imo, comes from teachers - early elementary and even preschool teachers. That's the time when a child is first exposed to (depending on where they live) a large number of peers of varying race and background. I've heard from teachers that some of these kids don't even understand the concept of race. They've never heard of it, so its utterly irrelevant to them! That, to me, is a pretty neat thing.

But some kids do have "attitudes" and that is a reflection of the attitudes of their parents. Yeah, I agree that prejudices are learned (either specifically taught or learned through experiences).
...the question is can it be unlearned?
On this, I'm not real optomistic. For kids, maybe, but once someone reaches adolescence, I think its pretty much over. My grandmother (deceased at 94 a couple of years ago) was pretty racist and there really wasn't any logic behind it or reasoning with her (we pretty much just let it go because there wasn't much we could do about it). Fortunately, my cousin laughed when my grandmother questioned her choice of names for her first son (Joshua - perhaps an unusual choice for a hard-core Southern Baptist), but it easily could have gotten ugly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #45
People like other people to be like themselves. According to Maslow's Hierarchy of needs the 'social need' (whereby people try to be part of a group) comes after 'basic needs' like food, water and sleep and the 'safety need', meaning that you feel safe.

I find it interesting that America, often seen as the most racist of developed nations, is also heralded as one of the least safe.
So, leaving the USA aside, in general would you say racism is more common in developed or undeveloped countries? certainly in areas of the highest form of racism.. genocide, it is very much unsafe; so if we are to believe Maslow then this racism must be fueled by something other than simple conformity.

On another note, Whites, being the dominant race (at least in the west), are often the ones subject to racism from the minorities, and vice versa. This, I think has nothing to do with white, black, indian, ect so much as power. Whites are seen as 'the overlord' and thus the minorities are seen as 'the oppressed' and so a natural feeling of rebellion happens, and whites retalliate.
It's more attacking power/defending power I think, which is why whites are hesitant to hire a non white person, (this also works for feminism and 'women in the office', ect.,)

On yet another note, I was watching a presentation about chris rock the other day, and I find it very interesting how comedians can get up on stage and make fun of the white audience, and everyone accepts it. But (regardless of race) not the black audience. Chris rock did challenge the black audience, picking specific 'groups' to make fun of, and on many tours got booed quite a lot, and in others he became more popular for it.
 
  • #46
Smurf said:
On yet another note, I was watching a presentation about chris rock the other day, and I find it very interesting how comedians can get up on stage and make fun of the white audience, and everyone accepts it.
Odd, isn't it, people will pay to have someone ridicule them. :wink:

In the US, racism isn't just white/black or white/hispanic. In Houston, TX where I grew up there is a very large Mexican (hispanic) community and they are very racist against blacks and vice versa, every night on the news it was a tally of how many blacks and hispanics had killed each other in gang related killings. They both hated the Vietnamese that started moving there.

When I lived in Washington DC, my husband at the time was in the Navy and there were quite a few people from the Philippines. The whites, blacks and hispanics all looked down on them. My next door neighbors were Filipino and they were SO NICE. The husband was the only one that could speak English, but he gave me some great gardening tips and would bring over some really great Filipino vegetables that he grew. I learned how to make the best spring rolls on Earth from my Filipino best friend I met at the Navy Exchange, his dad was in the Navy and he was a student at the University, absolutely brilliant guy.

When you confine yourself to your "own type" you lose out on so much. I feel sad for people that allow prejudice to rule their lives.
 
  • #47
Maybe we should all look forward to the future, say 100 years, when none of this will matter because the world will have become so much smaller and we will all be basicly the same color.
In Australia we had a politician who thankfully had a very short reign, who formed a political party based on what I would describe as racism. She pushed the right buttons with the racists after research showed that by 2030 I think it was, 1 in 4 Australians will be of Asian heritage. Thankfully, she was seen for what she is, a racist, as she was advocating many policies that would have taken us back to the stone ages.
Having said that, and speaking as a liberal non racist who has dated women of colour and is married to a Brasilian who is officialy classed as "morena", which we would define as "swarthy", the thought of my country no longer being "Anglo Saxon", makes me question our open immigration policies.
And even I can't help cringing........just a little, which is why I started this thread and still believe that in addition to racism being learned, I can't help but wonder if there is something happening at a much deeper level which we just don't want to admit.
 
  • #48
Wardw said:
which is why I started this thread and still believe that in addition to racism being learned, I can't help but wonder if there is something happening at a much deeper level which we just don't want to admit.
Virtually every "race" or "ethnic group" has some prejudices against another group to some extent. The same with religion, politics, wealth. Perhaps it is "human" to want to feel superior. However, those we choose to "accept" and those we choose to "put down" are not inborn traits, they are learned.

It is difficult for most people to admit that we become this way and the hatred and distrust can be "unlearned". "That" is what people don't want to admit. They want to believe that their beliefs are real and true and the way nature intended. Saying "this is just the way humans are designed" is an excuse for their behavior and justifies not trying to change.
 
  • #49
My uncle got a Japanese wife about 50 years ago and from what I can remember of her she was amazingly racist. Couldn't stand seeing anyone in a mixed race relationship. Ironic that she never realized she was in one herself.
 
  • #50
Smurf said:
On yet another note, I was watching a presentation about chris rock the other day, and I find it very interesting how comedians can get up on stage and make fun of the white audience, and everyone accepts it. But (regardless of race) not the black audience. Chris rock did challenge the black audience, picking specific 'groups' to make fun of, and on many tours got booed quite a lot, and in others he became more popular for it.
Chris Rock is a comedian, he's funny, and he's not racist. That's why whites (who have a sense of humor) like him even when he makes fun of them. But he's also socially conscious and some of his criticisms of the black community, even in the context of a stand-up comedy act, are for real. For that, he gets a mixed reception from blacks.

I like his comedy and I like his politics, but I can certainly see why some blacks would not.
 
  • #51
Evo said:
Virtually every "race" or "ethnic group" has some prejudices against another group to some extent. The same with religion, politics, wealth. Perhaps it is "human" to want to feel superior. However, those we choose to "accept" and those we choose to "put down" are not inborn traits, they are learned.

It is difficult for most people to admit that we become this way and the hatred and distrust can be "unlearned". "That" is what people don't want to admit. They want to believe that their beliefs are real and true and the way nature intended. Saying "this is just the way humans are designed" is an excuse for their behavior and justifies not trying to change.
How true. From my experience, it is based on deep insecurity. Racism seems to be worst where people have to struggle for a certain standard of living, and there seems to be a fear that success of others will somehow undermine one's own success. Eastern Europe and the former USSR providee a strong example of how people behave under conditions of deprivation.

WardW said:
the thought of my country no longer being "Anglo Saxon", makes me question our open immigration policies.
Actually in 1999, the Anglo-Celtic population was about 70%. (http://elecpress.monash.edu.au/pnp/free/pnpv7n4/v7n4_3price.pdf) So what? I guess the shoe is on the other foot, i.e. it didn't seem to bother the Anglo-Celtic population that they were imposing themselves on the native population (ethnic cleansing and in some cases genocide).

I went back for a brief visit many years ago - and I suffered culture shock. I didn't belong there, anymore than I am where I am. Actually, I am at home wherever I happen to be, anywhere in the world, which basically means I am always an outsider except to my friends. If I were to return to Australia, it would be to the outback.

IIRC, Australia's immigration policy is pretty restrictive, unless one has money. :rolleyes: http://www.immi.gov.au/migrate/index.htm

Evo said:
The husband was the only one that could speak English, but he gave me some great gardening tips and would bring over some really great Filipino vegetables that he grew. I learned how to make the best spring rolls on Earth from my Filipino best friend I met at the Navy Exchange, . . . .
Really cool, Evo! :cool:

Evo said:
When you confine yourself to your "own type" you lose out on so much.
Definitely.
 
  • #52
Evo said:
Virtually every "race" or "ethnic group" has some prejudices against another group to some extent...

Somebody I know was in Las Vegas last year. There was a major boxing match going on there. If I was a boxing fan, I would remember the names of the boxers, but I'm not a fan, so I don't. Anyway, he couldn't afford a ticket to the actual venue, so he settled for going to a hotel/casino that was broadcasting the fight live. Even that was something like 50 bucks. I asked him who most of the people were cheering for. With a pained look on his face (he is what I would call an idealistic liberal), he said the black fans were cheering for the black boxer and the Latino fans were cheering for the Latino fighter.
 
  • #53
Chris Rock makes at least as much fun of the blacks as he does the whites.

Evo said:
In Houston, TX where I grew up there is a very large Mexican (hispanic) community and they are very racist against blacks and vice versa, every night on the news it was a tally of how many blacks and hispanics had killed each other in gang related killings. They both hated the Vietnamese that started moving there.
Mightn't these have been turf wars rather than hate crimes ? Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised that gang members are racist.
 
  • #54
Gokul43201 said:
Evo said:
Originally Posted by Evo
In Houston, TX where I grew up there is a very large Mexican (hispanic) community and they are very racist against blacks and vice versa, every night on the news it was a tally of how many blacks and hispanics had killed each other in gang related killings. They both hated the Vietnamese that started moving there.

Mightn't these have been turf wars rather than hate crimes ?
No, at least in Houston, Mexicans hate blacks and the blacks hate the Mexicans (for the most part). Mexicans have special words for a mexican that would date a black. I use "Mexican" here because although we're supposed to say "hispanic", the Mexican culture in that part of Texas is unlike that in California, or the Latino (Puerto Rican) culture in Florida.

I got to know and be friends with enough people of Mexican heritage to know how they felt. They considered themselves above blacks. The two groups just didn't mix.

Of course you don't have middle and upper class Hispanics and blacks doing drive by shootings, it's mostly the gangs, but the prejudice is unfortunately still there.
 
  • #55
Evo said:
It is difficult for most people to admit that we become this way and the hatred and distrust can be "unlearned". "That" is what people don't want to admit. They want to believe that their beliefs are real and true and the way nature intended. Saying "this is just the way humans are designed" is an excuse for their behavior and justifies not trying to change.

Very well said. It is our consciousness and ability to make a choice that separates us from animals, and hence it is no excuse to claim "it is just the way humans are designed", when we retain that right to chose in other matters. And it is off outmost importance that we challenge our decisions and views, because snap judgements are more than often based on stereotypes. But on the other hand it is understandable that we upphold our self esteem and view of the world through such stereotypes, because if our and other's view of ourselves and the world is too different, we feel distress of various levels.

But I would still like to stress number 42's point about young childrens intergroup behavior and that this, "In minimal groups despite lack of conflict between groups there was intergroup bias. Suggested prejudice was an inevitable result of making distinctions between groups and cognitive categorization" - http://www.oglethorpe.edu/faculty/~a_marks/Soc%20204/CHAPTER%2012%20PREJUDICE,%20STEREOTYPING,%20AND%20DISCRIMINATION.htm is, as far as I know, very well supported, by numerous studies based on Social Identity Theory (SIT):

Social Identity Theory was developed by Tajfel and Turner in 1979. The theory was originally developed to understand the psychological basis of intergroup discrimination. Tajfel et al (1971) attempted to identify the minimal conditions that would lead members of one group to discriminate in favor of the ingroup to which they belonged and against another outgroup.
- http://www.tcw.utwente.nl/theorieenoverzicht/Theory%20clusters/Interpersonal%20Communication%20and%20Relations/Social_Identity_Theory.doc/

So, while a lot of particulary the racial prejudice is most surely learned, it seems we do have some form of not-learnt inclination to favour whatever group we identify with, because our tendency to cathegorize information and identify ourself in relation to it. However, this also suggests that we can overcome our prejudice through self-reflection and systematic processing (where we use less general cathegories or less stereotypes):
Overcoming Automatically Activated Stereotypes—stereotypic thinking is reflexive and automatic, it can be overcome be deeper processing and conscious effort (akin to forming a more sophisticated impression after automatic corespondent inferences.

As well as through positive contact:
What reduces bias?

...

Intergroup Contact: Getting to Know You to Change Stereotypes—contact hypothesis direct contact between members of different groups can reduce intergroup stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. Introduce inconsistent information and thereby change stereotypes.
The same notes as above
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #56
Actually, I am at home wherever I happen to be, anywhere in the world, which basically means I am always an outsider except to my friends.

Too True Astronuc, I feel the same. I love the buzz of arriving in a new country where I am forced to communicate in language other than oral (many years of theatre acting helps).
I immediatly look for the odd places to go, far from the tourist hangouts. I have been in some very dangerous locations and with a firm belief in karma, I have never been assaulted or robbed and have usually met the coolest people. Goethe was the original "universal man", I love the phrase. I have relatives in Scotland as my father's family emmigrated to Oz in the 50's as one of the 10 pound emmigrants and as such, I was brought up with Scottish culture (even played the bagpipes for some years). My mother's side was from Glostershire so I also have rellies there. I also follow the Oz news and like you, after just 12 years away, know that I would feel like an alien if I returned, so much changes so quickly. Or is it that our mindset changes so quickly when we are away from our birth countries. I prefer being a "universal man"..touche
Maybe everyone should be forced to change countries every 10 years. now there is a logistics challenge.
:cool:
 
  • #57
I said none.

If you grow up with your parents making references to other groups (bad or good), you will develop racism.

Note: 2-3 years ago was the first I ever thought in the sense of "other" groups because my gf kept bringing it up. Yes, it didn't last.

My parents never talked about other groups, not even Italians! (Apparently, that's a big thing.) Although my mother did make a comment the other day I didn't like, I freaked out. All this time I thought we were in a stereotype free family. Boy, I'm not happy at all.
 
  • #58
The husband was the only one that could speak English, but he gave me some great gardening tips and would bring over some really great Filipino vegetables that he grew. I learned how to make the best spring rolls on Earth from my Filipino best friend I met at the Navy Exchange,

Is that spring roll recipe in the public domain, should be, it's a public forum?? :-p
Here in Brasil spring roll recipes are thin on the ground.
Don't they say in Asia that the quickest way to a thinking man's stomach is via a spring roll??...no...perhaps they should :biggrin:
 
  • #59
So what? I guess the shoe is on the other foot, i.e. it didn't seem to bother the Anglo-Celtic population that they were imposing themselves on the native population (ethnic cleansing and in some cases genocide).

You're right Astronuc, that's the problem and that's why I think it's deeper than the conscious mind will admit. I lived in Darwin for a couple of years as a kid, and used to play with the local chiefs's son, I even play the didge (try anyway).
But as you know, Oz has some very specific problems in this regard. I stayed in Cairns for 3 months doing an mainframe installation some years ago, and on dole day the local people come down from Port Douglas for the day, by taxi, make the driver wait until the dole cheque is cashed and then go and buy fish and chips liberaly washed down with the local brew and then hitch home, only to repeat it again the next fortnight. When the government gave out free homes to them some years ago in the North East, they light a fire on the living room floor to cook the lizard, trashed the house and go off on walkabout.
This is not a criticisim in any way. Their lifestyle is just so dam different, they think that if this this silly white man wants to give me cash and a house, fine, but don't expect me to think the same way about them as he does. It's our failing and it's easy to look back in history and point fingers, but what's the point. The problem is that no-one has yet come up with a solution.
And obviously this discription does not apply to all.
Hell even the last of the Amazon Indians here, some tribes only discovered in the 90's all get around now in shorts and baubles with cellphones. What do we do. Perhaps our eduation system is just not what they need. I don't have the answers to that but I'd sure as hell like to hear suggestions.
edit..perhaps we are the virus
 
  • #60
When the government gave out free homes to them some years ago in the North East, they light a fire on the living room floor to cook the lizard, trashed the house and go off on walkabout.
This is a viscerally sore point with me. Stupid white men!

Some people of Anglo and European ancestry seem to have a cultural arrogance (superiority complex) in which they believe their culture is vastly superior to other ethnic groups. Look at what the Brits and Dutch did in Africa and Asia, and the Anglos in Australia. Look at the Anglos and French in North America, and the Spanish and Portugese in South and Central America.

I am thoroughly appalled at the past treatment of aborigines in Australia. Why do the Anglo-Australians think that all they have to do is give them cash and a house and all is well? Personally, I'd prefer to go walkabout.
 
  • #61
Personally, I'd prefer to go walkabout.


A trip worth making, agreed, you, me and David. BTW, ever see, "Walkabout" with John Mellion??
Fine film, he went to the other world only a few years ago I think.
 
  • #62
Wardw said:
BTW, ever see, "Walkabout" with John Mellion??
I haven't seen the movie. Looks interesting.

Wardw said:
A trip worth making, agreed, you, me and David.
Definitely worthwhile. I'll have to ask nge-ni-wiin-ya (willa, yungara). I'll bring me karli (kyli), but I'll need to pick up some ka-ma and jek-kor-a (or kaiya to some). I used Bengarang. I come from southern Koori.

Every now and then I have to get away from 'civilization'. :wink:
 
  • #63
Definitely worthwhile. I'll have to ask nge-ni-wiin-ya (willa, yungara). I'll bring me karli (kyli), but I'll need to pick up some ka-ma and jek-kor-a (or kaiya to some). I used Bengarang. I come from southern Koori.

Careful, some will think we have a private language thing going.
The movie is a true Australian classic 1971 re the purpose of a walkabout. Surreal scenery. It was the movie that launched the career of David Gulpilil. (he had a cameo walk on role in the first Croc Dundee movie). On DVD or available on teh web I believe.
 
  • #64
I'd love to meet David. He's done some great work. And it would be cool to go walkabout with him. I've always wanted to get up to Darwin.
 
  • #65
tribdog said:
My uncle got a Japanese wife about 50 years ago and from what I can remember of her she was amazingly racist. Couldn't stand seeing anyone in a mixed race relationship. Ironic that she never realized she was in one herself.
Tribdog, you are very correct,
I have to also say that Japanese people are racist.
But I guess because their country is developed and
young people are taught more about theorems, morality
and plus, they are also mostly influenced by religious thoughts, especially Buddhism's (I really like this point..),
That I think is why Japanese people in particular,
and Asian people here in general think of different things
and other people in a much "softer" way when compared to those in America/Europe, and that there would not be traggedies like someone gets stopped in the street on his way home by a group of bastards with long iron sticks, sharp knifves in hand...which I guess people in North America (especially in most states of the US, or in big cities of Russia and England)

The problem in Japan I think is NATIONALISM, the same as the US; "creative" are unable to survive; "Japanese people are the better than others", this point is mostly approved by most of foreign students/people who now live in Japan..


Admittedly I love threads like this...

Christophe
 
Last edited:
  • #66
In whichever ethnic group you look, you will see that there are a few individuals who have racial hatred to other ethnic groups. To say that only the ethnic europeans have this phenomenon is ridiculous.
 
  • #67
I worked as one of only a few white males in a minority owned engineering firm for three years. During that time I grew to notice color difference less and less.

One time one of the guys was trying to test me and he asked me if I liked working with black people more, or less, than working with white people. I told him, "I want to live in a world where color doesn't matter."

He said, "I like that answer."

I said, "It's true." And it was. I found that I had to make myself notice the color of the person, rather than that being the first thing I noticed.

I have since left that job (he was a bad business owner, bounced checks, etc.) and have helped three of the guys from that office find work where I work now. That was once an all white office, where prejudicical terms were fairly common. Now those comments are gone. I think working with other races help to bridge some of the gaps.
 
  • #68
I think there are different levels of racism. I am going to take a different viewpoint and say that a persons level of racism has more to do with awareness and perception that the people around them are 'different' rather than being taught. Racism can be taught hence taken to a new level, but I feel that everyone no matter what race you are has some degree of racism no matter how innocent or even ignorant of it they may be. If you feel bad because you might be somewhat racist, don't because it is completely natural. Take the animal world for instance, full of 'racism', if you don't look like the others you are look apon differently and treated differently, those are instinctive behaviors - to be curious and at the same time wary. A white rabbit will accept the company of another white rabbit without hesitation, along comes a black rabbit and he keeps his distance... Is that rabbit then racist? By definition yes, but that is what racism boils down to - willingness to accept or not accept.
 
  • #69
tdunc said:
A white rabbit will accept the company of another white rabbit without hesitation, along comes a black rabbit and he keeps his distance... Is that rabbit then racist? By definition yes, but that is what racism boils down to - willingness to accept or not accept.
I have never seen that type of behavior in animals. :rolleyes:
 
  • #70
Artman said:
I worked as one of only a few white males in a minority owned engineering firm for three years. During that time I grew to notice color difference less and less.

One time one of the guys was trying to test me and he asked me if I liked working with black people more, or less, than working with white people. I told him, "I want to live in a world where color doesn't matter."

He said, "I like that answer."

I said, "It's true." And it was. I found that I had to make myself notice the color of the person, rather than that being the first thing I noticed.

I have since left that job (he was a bad business owner, bounced checks, etc.) and have helped three of the guys from that office find work where I work now. That was once an all white office, where prejudicical terms were fairly common. Now those comments are gone. I think working with other races help to bridge some of the gaps.

This is an example of what is referred to as a "colorblind society." It always seemed to me to be the most mature, human way to progress. But the "colorblind society" mindset has itself come under attack from some corners as being a way for "white people to shrug off the injustices of the past." (I forgot whose quote I paraphrased there).

This leaves me, personally, in a bind: how does one simultaneously treat everyone of every race equally without prejudice while acknowleging the fact that some people have a harder go of it simply becuase they are not white?

As a teacher I must recognize that some kids go home to a stuctureless household where homework is never done and the parents are abusive, while others (in the same classroom) go to their private bedrooms in a quiet neighborhood. If those two kids get the same score on a test, who really deserves a higher grade? I know I'm talking social class here, not color, but it's the same thing. Sometimes equality is not fair.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top