Is zeta(-1) equal to -1/12? A Discussion on the Infamous Sum of Natural Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bgq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
Zeta(-1) is defined as the sum of the series 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ..., which leads to the controversial result that zeta(-1) equals -1/12. This result arises from analytic continuation of the zeta function, allowing it to extend beyond its initial domain. However, treating zeta(-1) as a traditional sum of natural numbers can be misleading and potentially problematic. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of extending the zeta function to values less than 1. For a deeper exploration of this topic, further discussions can be found in the linked thread.
bgq
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have read that zeta(x) = 1^(-x) + 2^(-x) + 3^(-x) + ... infinity
for x = -1, zeta(-1) = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 ...
What confused me is that zeta(-1) = -1/12 and so 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
Can anybody give a proof that zeta(-1) is -1/12.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have a fairly substantial thread on this topic already

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=732197

The main gist is that \zeta(x) is a function such that if x>1,
\zeta(x) = 1^{-x} + 2^{-x} +...
You can extend this function to allow for values of x smaller than 1, but when you do you aren't really calculating the sum of natural numbers anymore. In particular trying to do manipulations as if you really are calculating that sum can be dangerous. See the thread for more details and feel free to continue the discussion there.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K