Isn't this table for perceptron of AND gate wrong for B?

Thread starter shivajikobardan
Start date Jan 16, 2022
Tags

Gate Table

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the use of updated weights and bias in a model, specifically in the context of a batch size of one. The original question seeks clarification on why updated bias is utilized instead of the original bias. The response emphasizes the importance of presenting one's own calculations if there are perceived errors in the model's workings, rather than leaving others to infer the intended corrections. This highlights the need for clear communication and detailed explanations in discussions about model parameters and calculations.

Jan 16, 2022

shivajikobardan

Because we use updated bias and not the original bias? Please clear my confusion

Last edited by a moderator: Jan 16, 2022

Technology news on Phys.org

Jan 17, 2022

pbuk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

The model answer appears to use the updated weights and bias in columns w_1, w_2 and B, Edit: which is what I would expect (i.e. batch size = 1).

If you think some workings are wrong then you should present your own workings and point out the difference, don't leave us to guess at what you think the answer should be.

Last edited: Jan 17, 2022

Thread 'Star maps using Blender'

Blender just recently dropped a new version, 4.5(with 5.0 on the horizon), and within it was a new feature for which I immediately thought of a use for. The new feature was a .csv importer for Geometry nodes. Geometry nodes are a method of modelling that uses a node tree to create 3D models which offers more flexibility than straight modeling does. The .csv importer node allows you to bring in a .csv file and use the data in it to control aspects of your model. So for example, if you...

View full post »

Thread 'Who is responsible for the software when AI takes over programming?'

I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

View full post »