Isolating Quarks - Understanding the Logic

  • Thread starter Thread starter zachfoltz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quarks
zachfoltz
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Ok so I want to preface my question with the fact that I'm not trying to present a crackpot theory, I obviously have a flaw in my logic I just need a little correcting.

So I was reading about gluons and read that they had to have a mass to allow the strong force to have a limiting range. So this lead my thoughts to the conclusion that they must therefore have a speed less than c and therefore if we could separate two quarks faster than the speed that the gluons could move between them, how could more quark pairs be created. This would lead to isolation of quarks. This can't be right.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the mass of a gluon is zero, and the strong force (actually the color force) has an infinite range.

What prevents quarks from separating is that gluons also interact with each other, and as a consequence the color force gets stronger and stronger with increasing distance. It's as if the quarks found themselves trapped in a harmonic oscillator potential which rises indefinitely at large distances.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
That makes a lot of sense, in fact you just cleared up another thing on my mind related to this topic with that answer. Thank you!
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top