IUPAC Nomenclature: 3-Chlorobutane-1,2-diol

  • Thread starter Thread starter jadelamlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iupac Nomenclature
AI Thread Summary
The IUPAC name for the compound given is 3-chlorobutane-1,2-diol. The discussion clarifies that the 'e' in 'butane' is dropped in this case due to the presence of a consonant ('d') following it, which adheres to naming conventions. This is similar to how 'e' is omitted in 'propan-2-ol' when followed by a vowel. The rationale behind these conventions is to facilitate easier pronunciation. Overall, the naming rules are consistent and help in maintaining clarity in chemical nomenclature.
jadelamlam
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Give the IUPAC name of the following compound

OH  Cl
|   |
C-C-C-C
  |
  OH
(Note:Hydrogen atoms are not drawn)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Model answer:3-chlorobutane-1,2-diol
Why it is called 3-chlorobutane-1,2-diol instead of 3-chlorobutan-1,2-diol?
Consider CH3CH2CH2OH,it is propan-2-ol,where "e" from "propane" is dropped.
So e from 3-chlorobutane-1,2-diol should also be deleted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aside from the fact that CH3CH2CH2OH is propan-1-ol, I have seen both names with an e on the end and not. Sometimes it's a language thing - German for instance tends not to have them. Is this the case here?
 
It's a convention while naming the compounds. For instance, in propan-2-ol, the 'e' is dropped because there's a vowel next to 'e', that is 'o'. If it was a consonant, we would not have dropped the 'e' as it is the case with 3-chlorobutane-1,2-diol as 'd' isn't a vowel.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
It's a convention while naming the compounds. For instance, in propan-2-ol, the 'e' is dropped because there's a vowel next to 'e', that is 'o'. If it was a consonant, we would not have dropped the 'e' as it is the case with 3-chlorobutane-1,2-diol as 'd' isn't a vowel.

Thx a lot.But do you know the reasons of it?
 
Ahh, of course, thanks Pranav-Arora. As to why, it's probably along the lines of making things easier to say, with elided vowels etc
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...
Back
Top