I've been reused but not credited

  • Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date
In summary, the author discusses the experience of being reused in various contexts, such as art or writing, without receiving proper credit for their original work. This situation highlights issues of plagiarism, the importance of attribution, and the emotional impact of seeing one's creations repurposed without acknowledgment.
  • #1
DaveC426913
Gold Member
23,068
6,747
This is me:
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/electron-mass-vital-life-in-universe/

Or more specifically, that infographic "What Dave is Made Of" half way down the page is mine.

I made it many years ago, before I was smart enough to sign my work. At least I credited the author from whence I got the data to make it.

I've still got it published on my server.

The one in the article is credited to Jim Marsh at RationalDiscoveryBlog.com

I don't know if I should celebrate or get litigious...

1726182168389.png
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and BillTre
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's kind of like describing a building by listing the 2x4s, 4x6s, concrete bags, lengths of rebar, etc. It's descriptive in a basic sense but doesn't really tell you anything about the strengths or weaknesses much less what the structure looks like. Like describing a loaf of bread by its ingredients minus the details of how to mix, knead, rise, shape, and bake it.
 
  • #4
phinds said:
Check your link, Dave.
Thanks. Yes. Very strange. I posted this from my phone and it wouldn't stick. I re-edited and pasted the correct link about five times, testing it each time, because it was linking to the wrong place, even though I def pasted the correct link. I resigned myself to fixing it once back on my computer.

So now it's fixed.
https://www.davesbrain.ca/biology/atoms/index.html
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #5
JT Smith said:
It's kind of like describing a building by listing the 2x4s, 4x6s, concrete bags, lengths of rebar, etc. It's descriptive in a basic sense but doesn't really tell you anything about the strengths or weaknesses much less what the structure looks like. Like describing a loaf of bread by its ingredients minus the details of how to mix, knead, rise, shape, and bake it.
Indeed. A different perspective.
Like this:
1726186837984.png

Or this:
1726186885562.png
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #6
To paraphrase a 19th century adage, "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.". Have you contacted the plagiarizing website?

Though not a fan, Reader's Digest used to publish similar vignettes in articles such as "Ken's Kidneys" and "Mary's Migraines". Popular author Chuck Palahniuk satirizes Reader's Digest in his novel "Fight Club".
 
  • #7
DaveC426913 said:
This is me:
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/electron-mass-vital-life-in-universe/

Or more specifically, that infographic "What Dave is Made Of" half way down the page is mine.

I made it many years ago, before I was smart enough to sign my work. At least I credited the author from whence I got the data to make it.

I've still got it published on my server.

The one in the article is credited to Jim Marsh at RationalDiscoveryBlog.com

I don't know if I should celebrate or get litigious...

View attachment 351094
I used a slide just like this recently for some team members. They have not done chemistry since school so I started at the beginning. I think I got the info off wiki but it looks a lot like your slide.
 
  • #8
JT Smith said:
It's kind of like describing a building by listing the 2x4s, 4x6s, concrete bags, lengths of rebar, etc. It's descriptive in a basic sense but doesn't really tell you anything about the strengths or weaknesses much less what the structure looks like. Like describing a loaf of bread by its ingredients minus the details of how to mix, knead, rise, shape, and bake it.
You mean cell biology, biochemistry, physiology and anatomy? That would be a big slide!
 
  • #9
Well THAT was unexpected...

Not only did the editor edit the article to give me credit...

1726242555590.png

...but he was VERY appreciative to find me.

"First off, I have to tell you thank you for creating this image so long ago.
... I have never been able to find the original creator, and now I have!!
I have updated the article to include a proper credit to you and a link to your blog...
And I would like to thank you for making such an informative infographic!
Do you still make images such as these? I am so pleased to be able to communicate such a comprehensive set of data about the composition of the human body with just one graphic. As far as I'm concerned, you're a star!"


:blushes:
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Rive, Klystron, Ibix and 2 others
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
Not only did the editor edit the article to give me credit...

1726242555590.png

...but he was VERY appreciative to find me.

A real Mensch.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, berkeman, phinds and 1 other person
  • #11
Nice.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top