- #246
mheslep
Gold Member
- 364
- 729
It is obvious in both cases there is no real evidence that the Sen. embraces either Wrights views or a literal interpretation of the bible. In the later case you know Obama's "swallowing all the hokey angels and talking snakes nonsense" since, why? He's a monotheist? He went to church? He read the bible? No, its just an assumption, a package deal.And the difference between being informed by your pastor about socio-political views as opposed to the contents of your religious text is obvious.
To my mind in the Christian church they are supposed to be the same thing.It may be that he does, but it's the Church of God, not the Church of Love.