- #36
- 8,616
- 4,649
I haven't yet understood what Fröhlich means with his nonequivalence claim.DarMM said:What do others think of Fröhlich's argument about the inequivalence of the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures?
But it has nothing to do with Born's rule, unless you identify Born's rule with the existence of the expectation mapping (which, however, would empty Born's rule from all its empirical content).dextercioby said:I have always perceived that the equivalence of Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures is nothing but a disguised form of the Born's rule
Surely it is not equivalent to Born's rule, for it says nothing about measurement.
The equivalence just says that the time dependence of ##Tr~A(t)\rho(t)## can be distributed in different ways to that of ##A## and ##\rho##.