MHB Karla's question at Yahoo Answers (Intermediate Value Theorem).

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Value
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x)=(x-a)^2*(x-b)^2+x is continuous as it is a polynomial. It is established that f(a)=a and f(b)=b, meaning the values at the endpoints are a and b. The value (a+b)/2 lies between a and b, regardless of their order. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists some x in ℝ such that f(x)=(a+b)/2. Thus, the function indeed takes on the value (a+b)/2 for some x.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Karla,

The function $f(x)=(x-a)^2(x-b)^2+x$ is continuos in $\mathbb{R}$ (polynomical function). Besides, $f(a)=a$ and $f(b)=b$.

But $\dfrac{a+b}{2}$ is the middle point of the segment with endpoints $a$ and $b$ (no matter if $a<b$, $b<a$ or $a=b$) so, $\dfrac{a+b}{2}$ is included between $a$ and $b$. According to the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists $x\in\mathbb{R}$ such that $f(x)=\dfrac{a+b}{2}$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top